1. [Home](/)
2. Anchor

AN![Anchor logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=getanchor.ai&sz=256)

# Anchor review: pricing, features and alternatives (2026)

## Quick answer

Anchor is AI-native RFP, DDQ and security questionnaire software for enterprise sales and presales teams answering long, technical RFPs who want every teammate in the tool without seat fees. Pricing is quote-based, with a listed entry point of $125,000/yr. Check before buying: The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity.

AI-native response platform for complex enterprise RFPs and questionnaires

4.3/5[RFP Response](/categories/rfp-response)[DDQ](/categories/ddq)[Security Questionnaires](/categories/security-questionnaires)[AI-Native](/categories/ai-native)

Reviewed Oct 2026

1 of 70 published profilesNo paid placement[Sources checked: 14](#source-registry)

[Visit Anchor](https://www.getanchor.ai)[Compare with Sequesto](/comparisons/anchor-ai-vs-sequesto-2026)

**Key takeaways**
- **Overall score:** 4.3/5 across 9 capability dimensions.
- **Best for:** Enterprise sales and presales teams answering long, technical RFPs who want every teammate in the tool without seat fees.
- **Pricing:** [$125,000/yr](/pricing/anchor-ai) on a quote-only basis.
- **Standout strength:** Unlimited seats: its collaboration page and AWS listing both say there are no per-user charges, so SMEs can join without a licence fight.
- **Ecosystem:** 7 integrations; SOC 2 Type II.
- **Limitations:** The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity.

![Screenshot of the Anchor website](/screenshots/anchor-ai.webp)

Anchor · www.getanchor.ai

## The verdict up front

Anchor is a serious, enterprise-priced response platform for teams whose RFPs are long and formatted by someone who hates you. Its pitch is a knowledge base you never tag by hand, plus cited drafts on every answer. Seats are unlimited, so the engineers you need can actually log in.

The catch is the price tag. The only public number is an Enterprise Plan on AWS Marketplace at $125,000 for a 12-month contract. That makes Anchor a shortlist candidate for enterprise presales and security teams with real volume. It is a hard pass for anyone who answers a dozen RFPs a year.

Everything below comes from reading Anchor’s own site, including its security page and four published case studies, alongside its AWS Marketplace listing and Capterra profile as of October 2026\. Nobody here has run a live project in it, so treat the checklist at the end as the real evaluation plan.

## First, which Anchor?

Worth clearing up before you read anything else about this company. Anchor at getanchor.ai is operated by Anchor AI Ltd., which its terms of use place at Kibbutz Ga’ash, Israel. The co-founders on its About page are Ido Sever (CEO) and Itai Braude (Chief Product and Technology Officer).

There is a different Israeli startup called Anchor Browser that builds cloud browsers for AI agents. Anchor Browser announced a $6M seed round in October 2025, led by Blumberg Capital with Gradient participating, and its founders are different people. Some company databases fold the two together. If a deck or a data aggregator tells you the RFP Anchor raised that round, ask for the source, because the announcement belongs to the browser company. Anchor’s own site does not publish a funding figure.

## What it actually does

Anchor splits the product into four modules: response automation, knowledge management, document intelligence and collaboration. In plain terms, you load your content once and Anchor reads each incoming RFP or questionnaire. It drafts answers with citations, and your team reviews them in a shared workspace.

The document side is the part that stands out on paper. The AWS listing says Anchor ingests Excel matrices with nested dropdowns and horizontal tables. It also handles PDFs with requirements scattered across sections, and government-style tenders with inconsistent formatting, then normalizes everything into one structured workspace. Anyone who has spent a Sunday copying a 600-row vendor matrix into a tool will know why that sentence matters.

Before drafting starts, Anchor summarizes the RFP and flags risks or showstoppers. It also pulls out budgets and timelines to help with the go/no-go call. That is closer to bid qualification than most answer-library tools bother with.

For security teams there is a Chrome extension that fills questionnaires inside vendor portals. The InfoSec page says approved answers appear with mapped fields and citations in one click. Coralogix’s case study credits it with automating its vendor-portal flows.

## How drafting and the knowledge base work

The knowledge base is the core idea. Anchor says it parses and categorizes each document automatically, with no manual tagging or Q&A upkeep. It also claims to detect contradictions between sources and flag missing knowledge so someone can fill the gap.

You can segment content by region or product, and toggle individual sources on or off to control what the AI draws from. Answers can be reused across languages, which BioCatch’s case study highlights for its global teams. Approved knowledge is also reachable from Slack and Microsoft Teams, so a rep can ask a question without opening a project.

On drafting, Anchor claims it autofills up to 95% of questions accurately. That is the vendor’s own figure, so read it as a target to verify rather than a promise. The more useful detail is how drafts are grounded. The response automation page says every AI answer comes with citations and source links, and the InfoSec page adds that each answer shows its source and review date. Drafts can also pull from CRM data and case studies, so the answer speaks to the deal rather than reading like boilerplate.

The case studies are where the claims get specific. Papaya Global says it replaced a legacy RFP platform and onboarded more than 70 users within a few weeks. Bruker Nano Surfaces describes RFPs of 400 to 500 technical questions and credits Anchor with a 60% cut in response effort. BioCatch says Anchor replaced a platform it had implemented only three months earlier. All of these are vendor-published, so they show what Anchor is good at selling, not independent proof.

## Security and compliance posture

Anchor states it holds SOC 2 Type II. Its security page lists annual SOC 2 Type II audits plus regular third-party penetration testing. It also calls itself compliant with GDPR and CCPA. No ISO 27001 certificate is listed.

Hosting is on AWS. The security FAQ says customer data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and stored in isolated environments. Customer data is never used to train or fine-tune models, and model calls go through zero-retention endpoints. Access control covers SSO and MFA with granular roles at workspace and project level, and all actions are logged.

Two things to note for your own vendor review. First, Anchor offers single-tenant deployments for teams with stricter isolation needs, which is a real option for regulated buyers. Second, it does not publish hosting regions or a subprocessor list; the FAQ says region details are available on request. If EU residency is a requirement, get it in writing before procurement starts, not after.

## Pricing and how to buy it

There is no pricing page on getanchor.ai. Every call to action is a demo booking.

The one public figure sits on AWS Marketplace: an Enterprise Plan at $125,000.00 for a 12-month contract. The listing says the package is sized on an average of 150 questions per opportunity, and that Enterprise plans are custom. It also warns that additional integrations or customizations may cost extra. Seats are unlimited, so you pay for volume rather than headcount. The vendor refund policy on the listing reads “No refunds.”

Capterra shows a starting price for the same product that reads as $150,000 per user per month. That is almost certainly a data-entry quirk on the profile rather than a real rate. Ignore it and anchor (sorry) your budget conversation on the AWS figure.

Buying through AWS Marketplace means the contract bills through your AWS account, which some finance teams prefer. At this price, that procurement detail is worth raising early.

## Where it falls short

The price floor is the big one. A $125,000 annual contract puts Anchor out of reach for small teams. The 150-questions-per-opportunity sizing also means you should model your real volume before you trust any quote.

Extras can stack up. The AWS listing says integrations or customizations beyond the standard scope may add cost, so connectors you assume are included might not be.

Residency is opaque. AWS hosting is stated but regions are not. There is also no published subprocessor list to hand your security team.

Independent reviews are thin. The Capterra profile showed no user reviews when we read it, and the case studies on Anchor’s site are its own. You will be leaning on customer references more than on review sites.

## Who should shortlist it, and who should skip it

Shortlist Anchor if you are an enterprise B2B vendor answering long technical RFPs with a mixed crew of presales engineers and security staff. The unlimited seats suit that crew, and the document intake is aimed squarely at nasty Excel and PDF formats. It also fits teams replacing a legacy answer library that has rotted, which is the story most of its case studies tell.

Skip it if you answer a handful of RFPs a year or need a published price list you can sign up against today. Skip it too if your security policy requires a named EU region on day one and you cannot wait for a sales cycle to confirm one.

## How it sits next to the peers

[Loopio](/loopio) is the mature library-first choice. Its tagging and versioning are battle-tested, and big teams lean on its review cycles daily. Anchor’s bet is the opposite: no tagging at all, with the AI keeping the library tidy. Loopio wins on track record and a broad integration catalog. Anchor wins on seat model, since Loopio’s entry Foundations plan includes 10 seats.

[Responsive](/responsive) covers a wider workflow, from intake through submission, with named enterprise customers and a deep integration catalog. It is the safer pick if you need one platform for every response type across a large org. Anchor looks sharper on document intake and qualification, and it does not add user licences on top of the platform fee the way Responsive does.

[Inventive AI](/inventive-ai) is the closest like-for-like. It is also AI-native with unlimited users, and it puts a citation and confidence score on every answer. The difference is the entry ticket: Inventive’s plans start at $10,000 a year plus usage fees per RFP, while Anchor’s only public price is $125,000\. If your volume is moderate, Inventive is easier to justify. If your RFPs are enormous and your formats are ugly, Anchor’s intake pitch is the reason to compare them side by side.

[AutoRFP.ai](/autorfp-ai) is the accuracy-first tool for writing winning responses in a workflow that is easy to run. It offers unlimited users on published pricing from $899 a month, traces each line to its source, and has a browser extension for portals. It is the fit for teams that want to start without a long sales cycle. Anchor goes further into bid qualification and RFP summaries before drafting begins.

## What to test in a demo

Bring your own documents. A vendor sample proves nothing. Here is the checklist we would run:

- **Your worst Excel matrix.** Pick the one with merged cells and nested dropdowns. Check that Anchor maps every requirement and writes answers back into the right cells.
- **A 300-plus question RFP.** Time the first draft, then count how many answers a reviewer accepts with only light edits. Compare that number to the 95% autofill claim.
- **Citations under pressure.** Open ten random answers and click through to the cited source. Confirm the source actually says what the answer says, and check that review dates are visible.
- **Contradiction handling.** Load two policy documents that disagree on a retention period. See whether Anchor flags the conflict or quietly picks one.
- **The Chrome extension.** Run it against a real vendor portal your team uses, not a demo portal.
- **Export.** Ask for the finished response in your branded Word template, then check how much formatting cleanup is left.
- **Residency and subprocessors.** Get the hosting region and the full subprocessor list in writing, including which model providers handle your data.
- **Contract math.** Ask how the 150-questions-per-opportunity sizing scales at your volume. Then ask which integrations are included in the base package.

If Anchor clears that list on your own documents, the price starts to look like a staffing decision rather than a software line item. If it stumbles on your matrix, no amount of unlimited seats will fix it.

## Overview

Anchor is an AI-native platform for RFPs and security questionnaires, with DDQs in scope too, built for presales and security teams on complex enterprise deals. It drafts cited answers from a self-maintaining knowledge base and sells on unlimited seats, with its one public price on AWS Marketplace.

## Capability snapshot

Nine jobs, scored 0 (not offered) to 3 (category-leading). Anchor is strongest on RFPs and lightest on Self-serve onboarding. The same scores feed every comparison table.

- RFPs2/3
- DDQs2/3
- Security questionnaires2/3
- AI drafting2/3
- Answer library2/3
- Source attribution2/3
- Workflow & approvals2/3
- Integrations2/3
- Self-serve onboarding1/3

Strongest: RFPsLightest: Self-serve onboarding

## Key features

- AI drafts with a cited source on every answer
- Knowledge base with no manual tagging, plus contradiction and gap detection
- RFP summaries with risk flags for go/no-go calls
- Chrome extension that fills questionnaires inside vendor portals
- Unlimited seats with real-time co-editing plus approval routing
- Answers available inside Slack and Microsoft Teams

## Who it's for

Enterprise B2B teams where solutions engineers and security staff share the RFP and questionnaire load across messy Excel and PDF formats.

Used by

Papaya GlobalCoralogixBrukerBioCatch

### Strengths

- Unlimited seats: its collaboration page and AWS listing both say there are no per-user charges, so SMEs can join without a licence fight.
- Every generated answer carries citations and source links, and the InfoSec page says each answer shows its source and review date.
- Built for ugly intake formats: the AWS listing names Excel matrices with nested dropdowns and PDFs with scattered requirements.
- Its security page lists annual SOC 2 Type II audits plus regular third-party penetration tests, and single-tenant deployment is an option.

### Limitations

- The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity.
- The AWS listing says additional integrations or customizations may cost extra, and the vendor refund policy there reads "No refunds".
- Hosting regions and data residency options are not published; the security FAQ says details are available on request.

### Where it falls short

Gaps we found in research, each linked to its source.

- The only public price is an Enterprise Plan on AWS Marketplace at $125,000 for a 12-month contract, sized on an average of 150 questions per opportunity. [aws.amazon.com](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ype7cjjxoch6g), 2026-10
- The AWS Marketplace listing says additional integrations or customizations may incur extra costs, and its vendor refund policy reads "No refunds". [aws.amazon.com](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ype7cjjxoch6g), 2026-10
- Hosting regions and data residency options are not published: the security FAQ says Anchor runs on AWS and that region details are available on request. [getanchor.ai](https://www.getanchor.ai/security), 2026-10

## Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting

A security review of Anchor usually starts with three questions: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep data in the US or the EU. We only mark a yes when a public vendor page supports it.

ISO 27001

Not listed 

SOC 2

SOC 2 Type II [getanchor.ai](https://www.getanchor.ai/security), 2026-10

The security page lists annual SOC 2 Type II audits and regular third-party penetration testing.

US hosting

Not listed 

EU hosting

Not listed 

Anchor says it is hosted on AWS, with region and residency details available on request. Single-tenant deployments are offered alongside the multi-tenant service.

## Slack, Teams and the rest of the stack

Anchor collaboration is only as useful as the chat tools your SMEs already live in. Slack and Microsoft Teams are the two that matter on a live questionnaire.

Slack

Slack (answer lookup) [getanchor.ai](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/knowledge-management), 2026-10

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams (answer lookup) [getanchor.ai](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/knowledge-management), 2026-10

Also listed

Salesforce Sales CloudMicrosoft SharePointConfluenceGoogle DriveGoogle Chrome

## Subprocessors

For Anchor, start with the big three clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP), then look at niche processors that touch answer content, call a third-party model, or record sessions.

AWS, Azure, GCP

AWS

- **Amazon Web Services:** Cloud hosting for the Anchor platform [getanchor.ai](https://www.getanchor.ai/security)

Anchor does not publish a subprocessor list on its site. The security FAQ says model calls use zero-retention endpoints, without naming the model providers.

### Topics

[AI Native](/tags/ai-native)[Enterprise](/tags/enterprise)[Presales](/tags/presales)[Source Attribution](/tags/source-attribution)[Industry-agnostic](/tags/industry-agnostic)

### Pricing and value

[How much does Anchor cost?](/pricing/anchor-ai)

Anchor uses quote-only pricing, starting at $125,000/yr The only public price is an Enterprise Plan on AWS Marketplace at $125,000 for a 12-month contract, sized on an average of 150 questions per opportunity, with unlimited seats. Anchor says Enterprise plans are custom, and its own site routes buyers to a demo.

On our capability model it scores 4.3 out of 5 across 9 dimensions. Weigh that against enterprise sales and presales teams answering long, technical RFPs who want every teammate in the tool without seat fees to judge whether the price fits the job.

Pricing and details verified Oct 2026\. Confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.

## Who should pick Anchor, and who should skip it

**Pick it if** you fit this profile: enterprise B2B teams where solutions engineers and security staff share the RFP and questionnaire load across messy Excel and PDF formats. Where it earns its place: Unlimited seats: its collaboration page and AWS listing both say there are no per-user charges, so SMEs can join without a licence fight.

**Look elsewhere if** this limitation is a deal-breaker: The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity. Also look around if self-serve onboarding is central to how you work (1/3 here). In that case, one of the [Anchor alternatives](/alternatives/anchor-ai) may fit better.

## Bottom line

Best use case in one line: Enterprise sales and presales teams answering long, technical RFPs who want every teammate in the tool without seat fees.

**Considering Anchor?**

Teams evaluating Anchor often also compare [Anchor vs Sequesto](/comparisons/anchor-ai-vs-sequesto-2026), and [Anchor vs Thalamus AI](/comparisons/anchor-ai-vs-thalamus-ai-2026), or browse [Anchor alternatives](/alternatives/anchor-ai).

### Similar tools

Loopio, AutoRFP.ai, and Responsive come first as category benchmarks, followed by the closest peers on the job Anchor is hired for (shared categories and tags, plus aligned capabilities). The snapshot above already scores each job. The notes below say where each tool is stronger, lighter, or a match.

[**Loopio**](/loopio) (4.6/5, Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.)). Best for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. Matches Anchor on AI drafting, and leads on RFPs and DDQs. Audience: Teams in SaaS, tech, financial services, and healthcare answering high volumes of RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Watch-out: No public prices: the entry Foundations plan includes 10 seats, and multi-step reviews start one tier up on Enhanced.

[**AutoRFP.ai**](/autorfp-ai) (4.9/5, $899/mo). Best for software and finance teams answering structured RFPs in Word and Excel who want accuracy-first drafts, responses written to win, and a workflow that is easy to run. Leads Anchor on RFPs, DDQs, and AI drafting. Audience: Software and finance response teams whose RFPs come in as Word or Excel files and who want accuracy-first drafts, winning responses with every line cited to a source, a person, or the AI, and a workflow that is easy to run. Watch-out: Built for structured, source-cited answers rather than creative writing on long-form responses. For persuasive multi-page narrative, AutogenAI is built for that prose job.

[**Responsive**](/responsive) (4.6/5, $10,000 (Emerging edition)). Best for enterprise teams with complex approval chains and heavy integration requirements. Matches Anchor on AI drafting, and leads on RFPs and DDQs. Audience: Enterprise sales and proposal teams that need the widest workflow across RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Watch-out: Quoted by edition, user count, and add-ons, with a 12-month minimum term as standard and no free trial.

[**Thalamus AI**](/thalamus-ai) (4.2/5, Custom). Best for proposal teams that want bid qualification, compliance tracking and SME review in one AI workspace, not only faster drafting. Matches Anchor on RFPs, DDQs, and AI drafting. Audience: Enterprise proposal and bid teams running long narrative RFPs with many contributors, who also field DDQs and security questionnaires. Watch-out: No public price list; every buyer goes through a pricing recommendation call or a demo.

[**Sequesto**](/sequesto) (4.3/5, €750/mo). Best for european bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price. Matches Anchor on RFPs, DDQs, and AI drafting. Audience: Bid managers in regulated European businesses, such as life sciences or financial services, who answer tenders and security questionnaires side by side. Watch-out: Team (€750/mo billed annually) includes only 3 users and 2 MCP integrations; extra users cost €200/user/mo.

[**Wolfia**](/wolfia) (4.4/5, Custom). Best for GRC and customer-trust teams at software companies that field a steady stream of security reviews, many of them in vendor portals. Matches Anchor on DDQs and AI drafting, and is lighter on RFPs. Audience: Small security or GRC teams answering questionnaires for a much larger sales org, with policies already written down in tools like Confluence or Google Drive. Watch-out: No public prices: plans are scoped on a call from your questionnaire and contract-review volume.

[LO![Loopio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=loopio.com&sz=256)LoopioContent-library-first RFP response managementRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesLoopio is an established RFP response management platform built around a tagged, versioned answer library and multi-step review workflows. Loopio says more than 1,700 companies use it.from Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.)4.6](/loopio)[AU![AutoRFP.ai logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=autorfp.ai&sz=256)AutoRFP.aiAccuracy-first, AI-native, source-grounded platform for RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQsRFP ResponseDDQAI-NativeAutoRFP.ai is the accuracy-first platform for writing winning responses to RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs. Every answer is written from content your team has approved and shows the sources behind it, in a workflow that is easy to run: the library files each approved answer on its own.from $899/mo4.9](/autorfp-ai)[RE![Responsive logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=responsive.io&sz=256)ResponsiveEnterprise response management from intake to submissionRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesResponsive (formerly RFPIO) is a dedicated response-management platform covering RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires with a wide intake-to-submission workflow.from $10,000 (Emerging edition)4.6](/responsive)[TH![Thalamus AI logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=thalamushq.ai&sz=256)Thalamus AIAI-native bid workspace from go/no-go scoring to final reviewRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesThalamus AI is an AI-native RFP and proposal platform that starts before drafting: it scores bids and shreds the RFP into a live compliance matrix, then drafts cited answers with SME routing and review gates. Pricing is quoted per customer and includes unlimited users.from Custom4.2](/thalamus-ai)[SE![Sequesto logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=sequesto.com&sz=256)SequestoAgent-run bid workspace for tenders and questionnaires, with published euro pricingRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesSequesto is a Belgian AI platform for bid and tender teams: an orchestrating agent called James drafts cited answers from your knowledge sources while configurable workflows route review and approval. Plans are published in euros from €750 a month.from €750/mo4.3](/sequesto)[WO![Wolfia logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=wolfia.com&sz=256)WolfiaCited AI answers for security questionnaires, filled straight into buyer portalsSecurity QuestionnairesDDQRFP ResponseWolfia is a Y Combinator-backed AI agent that answers security questionnaires and DDQs from your live policy docs, citing a source on every answer. The same knowledge base runs a trust center and a contract-review agent, with unlimited users and volume-based pricing.from Custom4.4](/wolfia)

## Sources behind this Anchor review

Every page we read for the Anchor profile, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the [corrections page](/corrections).

Pricing

- [aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ype7cjjxoch6g](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ype7cjjxoch6g)Checked Oct 2026 · Pricing model · Starting price · Free tier · Plan tiers · Pricing note · RFPs score · Self-serve onboarding score · Limitation

Security and compliance

- [getanchor.ai/security](https://www.getanchor.ai/security)Checked Oct 2026 · SOC 2 · Hosting · Subprocessors · Certifications · Limitation

Product and integrations

- [getanchor.ai/product/overview](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/overview)Checked Oct 2026 · DDQs score
- [getanchor.ai/use-cases/infosec-team](https://www.getanchor.ai/use-cases/infosec-team)Checked Oct 2026 · Security questionnaires score · Integrations
- [getanchor.ai/product/response-automation](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/response-automation)Checked Oct 2026 · AI drafting score · Source attribution score
- [getanchor.ai/product/knowledge-management](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/knowledge-management)Checked Oct 2026 · Answer library score · Integrations · Slack · Microsoft Teams
- [getanchor.ai/product/collaboration](https://www.getanchor.ai/product/collaboration)Checked Oct 2026 · Workflow & approvals score
- [capterra.com/p/10038334/Anchor](https://www.capterra.com/p/10038334/Anchor/)Checked Oct 2026 · Integrations score · Integrations
- [getanchor.ai/articles/papaya-global](https://www.getanchor.ai/articles/papaya-global)Checked Oct 2026 · Named customers
- [getanchor.ai/articles/coralogix](https://www.getanchor.ai/articles/coralogix)Checked Oct 2026 · Named customers
- [getanchor.ai/articles/bruker](https://www.getanchor.ai/articles/bruker)Checked Oct 2026 · Named customers
- [getanchor.ai/articles/biocatch](https://www.getanchor.ai/articles/biocatch)Checked Oct 2026 · Named customers
- [getanchor.ai/terms-of-use](https://www.getanchor.ai/terms-of-use)Checked Oct 2026 · Headquarters
- [getanchor.ai/privacy](https://www.getanchor.ai/privacy)Checked Oct 2026 · Parent company

Third-party reviews

- No review-site source recorded.

## Frequently asked questions

Is Anchor the same company as Anchor Browser?

No. Anchor at getanchor.ai is run by Anchor AI Ltd. in Israel and builds RFP and questionnaire software. Anchor Browser is a separate company building cloud browsers for AI agents, and the $6M seed round announced in October 2025 belongs to Anchor Browser.

Does Anchor charge per seat?

No. Anchor sells unlimited seats. Its AWS Marketplace Enterprise Plan is priced per 12-month contract and sized on question volume (about 150 questions per opportunity), not on headcount.

What is Anchor?

Anchor is an AI-native platform for RFPs and security questionnaires, with DDQs in scope too, built for presales and security teams on complex enterprise deals. It drafts cited answers from a self-maintaining knowledge base and sells on unlimited seats, with its one public price on AWS Marketplace. In this directory it sits under RFP Response, DDQ, Security Questionnaires.

How much does Anchor cost?

Anchor uses quote-only pricing starting at $125,000/yr. The only public price is an Enterprise Plan on AWS Marketplace at $125,000 for a 12-month contract, sized on an average of 150 questions per opportunity, with unlimited seats. Anchor says Enterprise plans are custom, and its own site routes buyers to a demo.

Does Anchor have a free plan or trial?

No. Anchor does not advertise a free plan, so expect a demo or quote on its quote-only pricing.

What does Anchor do best?

Unlimited seats: its collaboration page and AWS listing both say there are no per-user charges, so SMEs can join without a licence fight. Every generated answer carries citations and source links, and the InfoSec page says each answer shows its source and review date.

What are the main limitations of Anchor?

The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity. The AWS listing says additional integrations or customizations may cost extra, and the vendor refund policy there reads "No refunds". Hosting regions and data residency options are not published; the security FAQ says details are available on request.

Who should use Anchor?

Enterprise B2B teams where solutions engineers and security staff share the RFP and questionnaire load across messy Excel and PDF formats.

Does Anchor handle RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires?

Anchor is capable on RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Enterprise B2B teams where solutions engineers and security staff share the RFP and questionnaire load across messy Excel and PDF formats.

What integrations and certifications does Anchor list?

Anchor lists Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce Sales Cloud, Microsoft SharePoint, Confluence, Google Drive, Google Chrome. Certifications on file: SOC 2 Type II.

Does Anchor have ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?

Anchor ISO 27001: Not listed. SOC 2: SOC 2 Type II. US hosting: Not listed. EU hosting: Not listed. Slack: Slack (answer lookup). Microsoft Teams: Microsoft Teams (answer lookup). Big-three clouds listed: AWS. Confirm on the vendor site before a security review.

Comparisons

[AN![Anchor logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=getanchor.ai&sz=128)vsSE![Sequesto logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=sequesto.com&sz=128)Anchor vs Sequesto](/comparisons/anchor-ai-vs-sequesto-2026)[AN![Anchor logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=getanchor.ai&sz=128)vsTH![Thalamus AI logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=thalamushq.ai&sz=128)Anchor vs Thalamus AI](/comparisons/anchor-ai-vs-thalamus-ai-2026)

[View all comparisons →](/comparisons)

Questions this tool qualifies for

- [Which RFP software can answer questions inside buyer portals?](/questions/which-rfp-software-can-answer-questions-inside-buyer-portals)
- [Can AI replace manual RFP writing?](/questions/can-ai-replace-manual-rfp-writing)
- [Which RFP software has human-in-the-loop review?](/questions/which-rfp-software-has-human-in-the-loop-review)
- [Which RFP software has the best Salesforce integration?](/questions/which-rfp-software-has-the-best-salesforce-integration)
- [Which RFP software can generate answers from SharePoint or Google Drive?](/questions/which-rfp-software-can-generate-answers-from-sharepoint-or-google-drive)
[All buyer questions](/questions)

[Summarize with ChatGPT](https://chatgpt.com/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fanchor-ai)[Summarize with Claude](https://claude.ai/new?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fanchor-ai)[Summarize with Perplexity](https://www.perplexity.ai/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fanchor-ai)

Copy link