1. [Home](/)
2. Civio

CI![Civio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=civio.ai&sz=256)

# Civio review: pricing, features and alternatives (2026)

## Quick answer

Civio is AI-native RFP and proposal software for tech and services companies selling to government at every level who want bid triage plus first drafts in one place. Civio does not publish a price, so buying is quote-only. Check before buying: Not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data; the terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the app is not FedRAMP authorized.

Agentic capture and proposal teammates for companies that sell to government

4.0/5[RFP Response](/categories/rfp-response)[Proposal Management](/categories/proposal-management)[AI-Native](/categories/ai-native)

Reviewed Oct 2026

1 of 70 published profilesNo paid placement[Sources checked: 8](#source-registry)

[Visit Civio](https://www.civio.ai)[Compare with Rohirrim](/comparisons/civio-vs-rohirrim-2026)

**Key takeaways**
- **Overall score:** 4.0/5 across 9 capability dimensions.
- **Best for:** Tech and services companies selling to government at every level who want bid triage plus first drafts in one place.
- **Pricing:** [Custom](/pricing/civio) on a quote-only basis.
- **Standout strength:** Covers the triage step most proposal tools skip: it reads incoming solicitations and ranks them before your team does.
- **Ecosystem:** 2 integrations; SOC 2 Type I.
- **Limitations:** Not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data; the terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the app is not FedRAMP authorized.

![Screenshot of the Civio website](/screenshots/civio.webp)

Civio · www.civio.ai

## The verdict

Civio is an early, agent-first platform for companies that sell to government, and it is pitched less as proposal software and more as a layer that does the triage work before anyone opens the RFP. It reads incoming solicitations, scores them, writes the go/no-go brief and then drafts the first response for a human to approve. If your real bottleneck is deciding which of 200 bid alerts deserve a team, that is a pitch worth hearing.

Two facts frame everything else. First, Civio is not built for controlled data: its own security page says it is not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled material, and the terms prohibit uploading CUI. Second, it is young. The security page lists a SOC 2 Type I report dated June 30, 2026, with Type II expected in Q4 2026, and I couldn’t find a review count on G2 or Capterra that I could load and verify.

So the short answer: worth a look for state and local sellers (plus civilian federal ones) working on non-CUI pursuits who want bid triage and first drafts in one place. A defense contractor whose packages carry CUI markings should look elsewhere, and Civio says as much itself.

## What Civio actually does

Civio describes itself as an “AI harness for B2G,” which is a lot of words for a fairly concrete idea. Instead of one chat box, you get four named agents it calls teammates, each with a job:

- **Pipeline** sources pursuits and screens them.
- **Pursuit** researches and qualifies an opportunity, then assembles a decision brief.
- **Proposal** turns the solicitation into a compliance matrix, then drafts from your approved content.
- **Solutions** fills government-provided requirement matrices row by row and routes technical answers to your experts.

Scoring runs on what Civio calls FIAT, short for Fit, Intent, Access, Timing. The pitch is that every opportunity, from an open bid to a task order or a teaming play, gets the same scoring model, so they can be ranked against each other. The product that handles bids and RFPs is called Civio RFX, and the login sits on its own app domain.

The FAQ says Civio is built for technology and services companies (consultancies included) selling to government at every level. Testimonials on its site come from OpenGov and Citibot, plus Merit, which tells you the early customer base leans toward GovTech vendors rather than large defense primes. An RFP program manager at OpenGov is quoted saying shredding and review went from a full working day to a few hours, and that a viable first draft now takes one to two working days instead of three to five. That is one customer’s account, published by the vendor.

You work with the teammates in Slack or Microsoft Teams threads, or in the web app. Email works too. The idea is that a subject matter expert can approve a section from a Teams thread without logging into another tool. Anyone who has chased an engineer for a technical answer at 4pm on deadline day will see the appeal.

## How drafting and the knowledge base work

Civio drafts from what it calls approved knowledge: past proposals and capability decks, plus your systems of record. Its GovWin and Loopio comparison page says your existing content library comes with you and becomes source material the Proposal teammate drafts from, rather than a library someone has to keep curating.

That is the AI-native trade in one sentence. You skip the library upkeep. You also give up the explicit owners and review dates that a mature library tool enforces, so freshness depends on the quality of what you feed in.

The more interesting part is governance. Civio’s security page says every output is traceable to the model and data behind it plus the person who approved it, and that data sent to external models is logged so you can see what left your tenant. High-impact actions need human sign-off. Its Claude page goes further: the model never acts on its own, and every agent action needs approval before it runs.

Civio is model-agnostic. Its Claude page names Claude plus GPT and Gemini as engines it can route to, and the security page says the actual providers are named in a subprocessor disclosure you get on request. It also says Civio deliberately doesn’t ship a generic MCP connector, preferring integrations scoped to a specific workflow. Reasonable position. It does mean you should ask early how it connects to your CRM, because the site talks about systems of record without naming them.

The speed claims are Civio’s own: a first draft within 24 hours of a go decision, and setup in as little as 48 hours. Test both.

## Security and compliance posture

Credit where due: Civio’s security page is one of the clearest in this category about what it does not do. Here is what it lists.

- **Certified:** SOC 2 Type I as of June 30, 2026, report under NDA.
- **In progress:** SOC 2 Type II, report expected Q4 2026.
- **Planned:** GovRAMP.
- **Not pursued:** FedRAMP. The page says the Civio application is not FedRAMP authorized, though it runs on AWS, which is.
- **Out of scope:** CMMC. Civio says it does not process CUI or FCI.

The data scope list is explicit. Not permitted: classified information or CUI. Export-controlled technical data (ITAR/EAR) is out, as is FCI where CMMC obligations attach. Health and payment card data are excluded too. Documents carrying CUI markings or a distribution statement have to stay in your own enclave. That rules out a large share of DoD proposal work, so settle it before the demo, not after.

Hosting is AWS US East (Virginia) and US West (Oregon), with backups kept in US regions and AES-256 encryption through AWS KMS. The vector database is Pinecone, isolated per customer namespace. Every Civio employee is in the United States. Deletion is guaranteed within 30 days of a request, and you can export your data in structured formats (JSON among them).

One thing to reconcile in contract review: the terms of use say Civio may keep customer data for up to 180 days after termination for audit and orderly shutdown. That doesn’t contradict the 30-day deletion-on-request promise, but you want the order form to say which one applies when.

## Pricing and how to buy it

No prices are published. Civio lists three plans: Source & Score (the Pipeline and Pursuit teammates), Draft & Deliver (Proposal plus Solutions) and Full Harness (all four). You email for a quote, and the site promises one within a business day. It also says implementation is free “this quarter,” which is a promotion, not a policy.

The more useful entry point is the 30-day Value Sprint. Civio runs on your real pipeline for 30 days at no cost and says the account is live within 48 hours. You pick up to two workflows. It starts from public-facing material such as submitted proposals and capability decks, and Civio sends an NDA before anything internal changes hands. That is a sensible way to test an agent product on live work. It is a time-limited trial, not a free plan.

The standard terms are worth reading before you sign. Invoices are due in 30 days with interest on late payments. Orders that auto-renew roll over for one-year terms unless you give 30 days notice, and fees are not refunded on termination. Put a calendar reminder in on day one.

## Where it falls short

- **No CUI.** Civio is not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled data, and the app has no FedRAMP authorization.
- **Young attestation.** SOC 2 Type I today, with Type II still in its observation window.
- **No published price.** All three plans are quoted by email.
- **Sticky terms.** Annual auto-renewal with a 30-day notice window, and no refunds on termination.

## Who should shortlist it, and who should skip it

Shortlist Civio if you are a GovTech or services company selling to state and local buyers, or to civilian federal agencies on non-CUI work. The fit is strongest when your pain is volume: too many alerts and not enough people to read them, with first drafts that start from scratch every time.

Skip it if your proposal packages routinely carry CUI or ITAR data, or if a customer’s security office will ask for a FedRAMP authorization on every tool that touches the bid. Skip it too if you need a governed answer library with owners and review cycles, or if your main inbound is commercial security questionnaires.

## How it sits next to the GovCon peers

**[GovDash](/govdash)** is the capture-to-proposal suite for US federal contractors, with eBuy and SharePoint integrations and a FedRAMP Moderate equivalency claim for CUI. If you are a federal contractor handling controlled data, GovDash is the more natural fit, and it publishes a plan structure you can plan against. Civio’s edge is the triage step and a broader state and local reach.

**[Sweetspot](/sweetspot)** is the other discovery-plus-drafting tool. It leads on federal award data (it says it indexes more than 167 million awards) and lists CMMC Level 2 plus SOC 2 Type II, a more mature attestation than Civio’s Type I. If you need defense-industrial-base security today, Sweetspot is ahead. Civio’s pitch is broader coverage of the revenue cycle beyond open bids, such as expansion and recompetes.

**[Rohirrim](/rohirrim)** wins when the job is long-form technical narrative for high-compliance US GovCon work, deployed into Azure Government or your own cloud. Civio is not trying to compete on that deployment model, and its data scope rules it out for most of those packets.

**[AutogenAI](/autogenai)** owns essay-style narrative bids, including international public-sector tenders, with ISO 27001 plus a separate FedRAMP High federal environment. Civio is aimed earlier in the cycle, at which bid to chase, and lighter on prose craft as a selling point.

Civio also pitches itself as a replacement for running [Loopio](/loopio) alongside a market intelligence database. Be fair to Loopio here: its library governance is mature and proven at scale, and a team with a well-kept library may not want to give that up for drafting from raw sources.

## What to test in a demo or Value Sprint

- Feed it a month of real bid alerts. Check whether the FIAT ranking matches what your capture lead would have picked.
- Ask for a go/no-go brief on a bid you already decided, and compare its reasoning to yours.
- Run one live solicitation through to a first draft. Time it against the 24-hour claim.
- Open a drafted paragraph and ask which source it used and who approved it.
- Have a requirement matrix filled by the Solutions teammate, then have your SME grade ten random rows.
- Ask for the subprocessor disclosure, including model providers, plus the SOC 2 report.
- Ask which CRM it writes to and with what permissions.
- Get the order form’s renewal clause and data retention period in writing before day 30.

If the triage holds up on your own pipeline, Civio earns a real conversation. If your work carries CUI, the conversation is short.

## Overview

Civio is an AI platform for B2G revenue teams that scores incoming opportunities and drafts first responses through governed AI teammates, with a human approving each step.

## Capability snapshot

Nine jobs, scored 0 (not offered) to 3 (category-leading). Civio is strongest on RFPs and lightest on DDQs. The same scores feed every comparison table.

- RFPs2/3
- DDQs1/3
- Security questionnaires1/3
- AI drafting2/3
- Answer library1/3
- Source attribution2/3
- Workflow & approvals2/3
- Integrations1/3
- Self-serve onboarding1/3

Strongest: RFPsLightest: DDQs

## Key features

- FIAT scoring (Fit, Intent, Access, Timing) on every incoming solicitation and account signal
- Go/no-go decision briefs assembled by a Pursuit teammate
- Section L and M compliance matrix plus a first draft from approved content
- Solutions teammate that fills government-provided Excel requirement matrices row by row
- Works from Slack or Microsoft Teams threads, plus email
- Logging of every model call, including what data left your tenant

## Who it's for

B2G capture and proposal teams working on non-CUI pursuits who would rather approve agent output than run prompts themselves.

Used by

OpenGovCitibotMerit

### Strengths

- Covers the triage step most proposal tools skip: it reads incoming solicitations and ranks them before your team does.
- Unusually candid security page that spells out what you may not upload, plus a no-training commitment written into contracts.
- A 30-day Value Sprint on your own pipeline, live within 48 hours by Civio's account, at no cost.

### Limitations

- Not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data; the terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the app is not FedRAMP authorized.
- SOC 2 Type I only (June 30, 2026); the Type II report is expected in Q4 2026.
- No public pricing; all three plans are quoted by email.
- Order terms auto-renew for one-year periods with 30 days notice to cancel, and fees are not refunded on termination.

### Where it falls short

Gaps we found in research, each linked to its source.

- Civio is not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data, its terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the application itself is not FedRAMP authorized. [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security), 2026-10
- Its attestation is SOC 2 Type I as of June 30, 2026, with the Type II report expected in Q4 2026\. [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security), 2026-10
- No prices are published; all three plans are quoted by email. [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/best-govwin-and-loopio-alternative), 2026-10
- Its terms auto-renew orders for one-year periods unless you give 30 days notice, with no refund of fees on termination. Customer data may be retained for up to 180 days after the contract ends. [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/legals/terms-of-use), 2026-10

## Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting

A security review of Civio usually starts with three questions: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep data in the US or the EU. We only mark a yes when a public vendor page supports it.

ISO 27001

Not listed 

SOC 2

SOC 2 Type I [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security), 2026-10

Certified June 30, 2026\. Type II report expected Q4 2026\. Report available under NDA.

US hosting

Yes (AWS US East in Virginia plus US West in Oregon) [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security), 2026-10

EU hosting

Not listed 

Civio states that all customer data is hosted and processed in the United States only, with backups kept in US regions. No EU residency option is offered.

## Slack, Teams and the rest of the stack

Civio collaboration is only as useful as the chat tools your SMEs already live in. Slack and Microsoft Teams are the two that matter on a live questionnaire.

Slack

Slack [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/), 2026-10

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/), 2026-10

## Subprocessors

For Civio, start with the big three clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP), then look at niche processors that touch answer content, call a third-party model, or record sessions.

AWS, Azure, GCP

AWS

- **Amazon Web Services:** Hosting plus key management [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security)
- **Pinecone:** Vector database, isolated per customer namespace [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security)
- **AI model providers (named on request):** Model inference under no-training agreements Watch-out: Civio routes tasks across models and names the providers only in a disclosure sent on request. [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/security)

The public page lists AWS and Pinecone; the full subprocessor disclosure, including model providers, is available on request.

### Topics

[AI Native](/tags/ai-native)[GovCon](/tags/govcon)[Capture Management](/tags/capture-management)[Government & Public Sector](/industries/government)[Workflow](/tags/workflow)

### Pricing and value

[How much does Civio cost?](/pricing/civio)

Civio uses quote-only pricing, quoted per deal rather than published Three plans (Source & Score, Draft & Deliver, Full Harness) are quoted by email; no prices are published. A 30-day Value Sprint on your own pipeline is offered at no cost.

On our capability model it scores 4.0 out of 5 across 9 dimensions. Weigh that against tech and services companies selling to government at every level who want bid triage plus first drafts in one place to judge whether the price fits the job.

Pricing and details verified Oct 2026\. Confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.

## Who should pick Civio, and who should skip it

**Pick it if** you fit this profile: B2G capture and proposal teams working on non-CUI pursuits who would rather approve agent output than run prompts themselves. Where it earns its place: Covers the triage step most proposal tools skip: it reads incoming solicitations and ranks them before your team does.

**Look elsewhere if** this limitation is a deal-breaker: Not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data; the terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the app is not FedRAMP authorized. Also look around if ddqs is central to how you work (1/3 here). In that case, one of the [Civio alternatives](/alternatives/civio) may fit better.

## Bottom line

Best use case in one line: Tech and services companies selling to government at every level who want bid triage plus first drafts in one place.

**Considering Civio?**

Teams evaluating Civio often also compare [Civio vs Rohirrim](/comparisons/civio-vs-rohirrim-2026), and [Civio vs GovDash](/comparisons/civio-vs-govdash-2026), or browse [Civio alternatives](/alternatives/civio).

### Similar tools

Loopio, AutoRFP.ai, and Responsive come first as category benchmarks, followed by the closest peers on the job Civio is hired for (shared categories and tags, plus aligned capabilities). The snapshot above already scores each job. The notes below say where each tool is stronger, lighter, or a match.

[**Loopio**](/loopio) (4.6/5, Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.)). Best for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. Matches Civio on AI drafting, and leads on RFPs and DDQs. Audience: Teams in SaaS, tech, financial services, and healthcare answering high volumes of RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Watch-out: No public prices: the entry Foundations plan includes 10 seats, and multi-step reviews start one tier up on Enhanced.

[**AutoRFP.ai**](/autorfp-ai) (4.9/5, $899/mo). Best for software and finance teams answering structured RFPs in Word and Excel who want accuracy-first drafts, responses written to win, and a workflow that is easy to run. Leads Civio on RFPs, DDQs, and AI drafting. Audience: Software and finance response teams whose RFPs come in as Word or Excel files and who want accuracy-first drafts, winning responses with every line cited to a source, a person, or the AI, and a workflow that is easy to run. Watch-out: Built for structured, source-cited answers rather than creative writing on long-form responses. For persuasive multi-page narrative, AutogenAI is built for that prose job.

[**Responsive**](/responsive) (4.6/5, $10,000 (Emerging edition)). Best for enterprise teams with complex approval chains and heavy integration requirements. Matches Civio on AI drafting, and leads on RFPs and DDQs. Audience: Enterprise sales and proposal teams that need the widest workflow across RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Watch-out: Quoted by edition, user count, and add-ons, with a 12-month minimum term as standard and no free trial.

[**GovDash**](/govdash) (4.0/5, Custom). Best for US government contractors running US federal bids from capture through proposal. Matches Civio on RFPs, DDQs, and AI drafting. Audience: US GovCon business-development and proposal teams that need a workflow built for US federal buyers, not a general questionnaire tool. Watch-out: FedRAMP Ready on the marketplace with zero agency authorizations as of April 2026.

[**GovEagle**](/goveagle) (4.1/5, Custom). Best for US government contractors who want capture and proposal AI that works inside Word and SharePoint. Matches Civio on DDQs and AI drafting, and leads on RFPs. Audience: Federal and defense proposal teams (plus SLED bidders) that live in Microsoft Office and need a FedRAMP Moderate environment for CUI. Watch-out: FedRAMP Moderate status comes from running as a tenant inside the Knox Systems authorization (effective July 31, 2026); on-prem deployments sit outside it.

[**Sweetspot**](/sweetspot) (4.1/5, Custom). Best for govCon teams that want opportunity discovery and drafting under one roof. Matches Civio on DDQs, and leads on RFPs and AI drafting. Audience: Government contracting BD, capture, and proposal teams who need to find federal work and respond to it. Watch-out: FedRAMP Moderate Authorization is still in progress.

[LO![Loopio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=loopio.com&sz=256)LoopioContent-library-first RFP response managementRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesLoopio is an established RFP response management platform built around a tagged, versioned answer library and multi-step review workflows. Loopio says more than 1,700 companies use it.from Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.)4.6](/loopio)[AU![AutoRFP.ai logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=autorfp.ai&sz=256)AutoRFP.aiAccuracy-first, AI-native, source-grounded platform for RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQsRFP ResponseDDQAI-NativeAutoRFP.ai is the accuracy-first platform for writing winning responses to RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs. Every answer is written from content your team has approved and shows the sources behind it, in a workflow that is easy to run: the library files each approved answer on its own.from $899/mo4.9](/autorfp-ai)[RE![Responsive logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=responsive.io&sz=256)ResponsiveEnterprise response management from intake to submissionRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesResponsive (formerly RFPIO) is a dedicated response-management platform covering RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires with a wide intake-to-submission workflow.from $10,000 (Emerging edition)4.6](/responsive)[GO![GovDash logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=govdash.com&sz=256)GovDashCapture-to-proposal AI built for US government contractorsRFP ResponseProposal ManagementAI-NativeGovDash is built specifically for US government contractors: business development, capture, and proposal work in one place, with compliance tracking and portal integrations aimed at US federal buyers.from Custom4.0](/govdash)[GO![GovEagle logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=goveagle.com&sz=256)GovEagleProposal and capture AI for US government contractors, inside Microsoft OfficeRFP ResponseProposal ManagementAI-NativeGovEagle is a capture and proposal platform for government contractors that shreds solicitations into compliance matrices and drafts in your Word templates, running inside a FedRAMP Moderate boundary.from Custom4.1](/goveagle)[SW![Sweetspot logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=sweetspot.so&sz=256)SweetspotFederal opportunity discovery plus proposal AIRFP ResponseProposal ManagementAI-NativeSweetspot pairs federal market intelligence (it says it indexes 167M+ federal awards) with AI proposal drafting, so government contractors can find opportunities and respond to them from one platform.from Custom4.1](/sweetspot)

## Sources behind this Civio review

Every page we read for the Civio profile, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the [corrections page](/corrections).

Pricing

- [civio.ai/best-govwin-and-loopio-alternative](https://www.civio.ai/best-govwin-and-loopio-alternative)Checked Oct 2026 · Pricing model · Starting price · Plan tiers · Answer library score · Integrations score · Named customers · Limitation
- [civio.ai/value-sprint](https://www.civio.ai/value-sprint)Checked Oct 2026 · Free tier · Pricing note · DDQs score · Self-serve onboarding score

Security and compliance

- [civio.ai/security](https://www.civio.ai/security)Checked Oct 2026 · SOC 2 · US hosting · Hosting · Subprocessors · Certifications · Source attribution score · Workflow & approvals score · Limitation

Product and integrations

- [civio.ai/faq](https://www.civio.ai/faq)Checked Oct 2026 · RFPs score
- [civio.ai/proposal-and-capture](https://www.civio.ai/proposal-and-capture)Checked Oct 2026 · Security questionnaires score · AI drafting score
- [civio.ai](https://www.civio.ai/)Checked Oct 2026 · Integrations · Slack · Microsoft Teams · Headquarters
- [vcbacked.co/company/civioai](https://www.vcbacked.co/company/civioai)Checked Oct 2026 · Funding
- [civio.ai/legals/terms-of-use](https://www.civio.ai/legals/terms-of-use)Checked Oct 2026 · Parent company · Limitation

Third-party reviews

- No review-site source recorded.

## Frequently asked questions

Can I put CUI or ITAR data into Civio?

No. Civio's security page says it is not an authorized environment for CUI or classified material, export-controlled data included, and its terms prohibit uploading CUI. Keep marked documents in your own enclave.

Can I try Civio before buying?

Civio offers a 30-day Value Sprint on your real pipeline at no cost. It starts from public materials such as submitted proposals, with an NDA before any internal data changes hands.

What is Civio?

Civio is an AI platform for B2G revenue teams that scores incoming opportunities and drafts first responses through governed AI teammates, with a human approving each step. In this directory it sits under RFP Response, Proposal Management, AI-Native.

How much does Civio cost?

Civio is sold on a quote-only basis, so pricing is quoted rather than published. Three plans (Source & Score, Draft & Deliver, Full Harness) are quoted by email; no prices are published. A 30-day Value Sprint on your own pipeline is offered at no cost.

Does Civio have a free plan or trial?

No. Civio does not advertise a free plan, so expect a demo or quote on its quote-only pricing.

What does Civio do best?

Covers the triage step most proposal tools skip: it reads incoming solicitations and ranks them before your team does. Unusually candid security page that spells out what you may not upload, plus a no-training commitment written into contracts.

What are the main limitations of Civio?

Not an authorized environment for CUI or export-controlled (ITAR/EAR) data; the terms prohibit uploading CUI, and the app is not FedRAMP authorized. SOC 2 Type I only (June 30, 2026); the Type II report is expected in Q4 2026\. No public pricing; all three plans are quoted by email. Order terms auto-renew for one-year periods with 30 days notice to cancel, and fees are not refunded on termination.

Who should use Civio?

B2G capture and proposal teams working on non-CUI pursuits who would rather approve agent output than run prompts themselves.

Does Civio handle RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires?

Civio is capable on RFPs, and DDQs and security questionnaires are a limited fit. B2G capture and proposal teams working on non-CUI pursuits who would rather approve agent output than run prompts themselves.

What integrations and certifications does Civio list?

Civio lists Slack, Microsoft Teams. Certifications on file: SOC 2 Type I.

Does Civio have ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?

Civio ISO 27001: Not listed. SOC 2: SOC 2 Type I. US hosting: Yes (AWS US East in Virginia plus US West in Oregon). EU hosting: Not listed. Slack: Slack. Microsoft Teams: Microsoft Teams. Big-three clouds listed: AWS. Confirm on the vendor site before a security review.

Comparisons

[CI![Civio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=civio.ai&sz=128)vsRO![Rohirrim logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=rohirrim.com&sz=128)Civio vs Rohirrim](/comparisons/civio-vs-rohirrim-2026)[CI![Civio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=civio.ai&sz=128)vsGO![GovDash logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=govdash.com&sz=128)Civio vs GovDash](/comparisons/civio-vs-govdash-2026)

[View all comparisons →](/comparisons)

Questions this tool qualifies for

- [Which RFP software has human-in-the-loop review?](/questions/which-rfp-software-has-human-in-the-loop-review)
- [How do you switch RFP software without rebuilding your answer library?](/questions/how-to-migrate-rfp-software-without-rebuilding-your-answer-library)
- [Which RFP software works in Slack or Microsoft Teams?](/questions/which-rfp-software-works-in-slack-or-microsoft-teams)
- [Which RFP software can import Excel RFPs automatically?](/questions/which-rfp-software-can-import-excel-rfps-automatically)
- [Which RFP software helps with go/no-go decisions?](/questions/which-rfp-software-helps-with-go-no-go-decisions)
[All buyer questions](/questions)

[Summarize with ChatGPT](https://chatgpt.com/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcivio)[Summarize with Claude](https://claude.ai/new?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcivio)[Summarize with Perplexity](https://www.perplexity.ai/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcivio)

Copy link