1. [Home](/) 2. [Comparisons](/comparisons) 3. Loopio vs SecurityPal (2026) Comparisons # Loopio vs SecurityPal (2026): pricing, features and verdict Loopio: Content-library-first RFP response management. SecurityPal: Security questionnaires completed for you by AI plus certified analysts. ## Quick verdict Choose Loopio for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library; choose SecurityPal for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so quote both on the same scope. In our capability model Loopio leads on RFPs and DDQs, while SecurityPal leads on AI drafting and self-serve setup. Both profiles reviewed Jul 2026 2 of 70 profiles, one scoring modelNo paid placement[Sources checked: 16](#source-registry) ## Choose Loopio or SecurityPal ### LO![Loopio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=loopio.com&sz=128) Choose Loopio when - Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. - You need stronger RFPs and DDQs than SecurityPal offers. ### SE![SecurityPal logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=securitypalhq.com&sz=128) Choose SecurityPal when - Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. - You need stronger AI drafting and self-serve setup than Loopio offers. **Key takeaways** - **Loopio:** Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. - **SecurityPal:** Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. - **Pricing:** Loopio Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.) vs SecurityPal Custom ## Side-by-side comparison __Scores run 0 (not offered) to 3 (category-leading). Edge marks who leads the row; Match means the scores are the same. Confirm certifications on the vendor site before a security review.__ | Capability | Loopio | SecurityPal | Edge | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | | Best for | Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. | Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. | \- | | Starting price | Custom (\~$20K+/yr est.) | Custom | Match | | Free tier | No | No | Match | | RFPs | 3/3 | 1/3 | Loopio | | DDQs | 3/3 | 2/3 | Loopio | | Security questionnaires | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match | | AI drafting | 2/3 | 3/3 | SecurityPal | | Answer library | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match | | Source attribution | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match | | Workflow & approvals | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match | | Integrations | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match | | Self-serve onboarding | 0/3 | 1/3 | SecurityPal | | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001 (legal addendum) | Not listed | \- | | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II | \- | | US hosting | Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California) | Not listed | \- | | EU hosting | Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland) | Not listed | \- | | Slack | Slack (NA and EU apps) | Slack | \- | | Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps) | Microsoft Teams | \- | | AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS | GCP | \- | | Listed integrations | Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Seismic, SharePoint | Salesforce, Okta, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Confluence, HubSpot, Google Drive | \- | | Certifications | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | \- | ## What they look like ### LO![Loopio logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=loopio.com&sz=128) Loopio ![Screenshot of the Loopio website](/screenshots/loopio.webp) ### SE![SecurityPal logo](https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=securitypalhq.com&sz=128) SecurityPal ![Screenshot of the SecurityPal website](/screenshots/securitypal.webp) ## Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting Put Loopio and SecurityPal through the same three questions a security reviewer will ask: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep the tenancy in the US or the EU. Cells say **Not listed** when we could not find the claim on a public vendor page. __Confirm certificates and residency on the vendor site or Trust Center before a formal review.Loopio: North America and EU are separate Loopio environments (company.loopio.com vs company.eu.loopio.com). City-level AWS regions are published on Loopio Slack marketplace security answers. Loopio's own security page names AWS without naming the city. SecurityPal: SecurityPal hosts on Google Cloud Platform. Its trust center does not name a region or offer a US/EU choice.__ | Check | Loopio | SecurityPal | | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ISO 27001 | ISO 27001 (legal addendum) [loopio.com](https://loopio.com/legal/infosec-addendum/), 2026-08Loopio legal addenda cite ISO 27001 and ISO 9001\. The public security page describes an ISMS based on ISO 27001 rather than showing a certificate badge. | Not listed | | SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II [loopio.com](https://loopio.com/platform/security/), 2026-08 | SOC 2 Type II [trust.securitypal.com](https://trust.securitypal.com/), 2026-10Latest announced attestation covers July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 with zero exceptions; a 2026 bridge letter is listed. Report available on request. | | US hosting | Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California) [slack.com](https://slack.com/marketplace/AHV240S3C-loopio), 2026-08 | Not listed | | EU hosting | Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland) [slack.com](https://slack.com/marketplace/A04DB06HK1U-loopio-eu), 2026-08 | Not listed | ## Slack and Microsoft Teams During a live questionnaire, SMEs get pinged in Slack or Teams, not in a vendor portal. Here is what Loopio and SecurityPal publish for those two connections. __Native chat apps only. CRM, storage and identity connectors stay in the integrations list.__ | Connection | Loopio | SecurityPal | | --------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Slack | Slack (NA and EU apps) [slack.com](https://slack.com/marketplace/AHV240S3C-loopio), 2026-08 | Slack [securitypalhq.com](https://www.securitypalhq.com/), 2026-10 | | Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps) [loopio.com](https://support.loopio.com/hc/en-us/articles/6595343686803-How-Do-I-Get-the-Microsoft-Teams-Integration), 2026-08 | Microsoft Teams [securitypalhq.com](https://www.securitypalhq.com/), 2026-10 | ## Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names Compare Loopio and SecurityPal on AWS, Azure and GCP first. Then scan for niche processors a reviewer should pause on: third-party LLMs, session replay, or support that leaves the region you elected. __Cloud row lists the big three only. Niche names sit in the notes when the vendor published them.__ | Layer | Loopio | SecurityPal | | --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS | GCP | | Watch-outs | **Rackspace:** US-only backup copy sitting outside AWS. Confirm whether that path is in scope for an EU tenancy.Loopio does not publish a full named subprocessor table on its public security page. Confirm the current list in the DPA or during security review. | **OpenAI:** Listed as opt-in only. Confirm whether the AI drafting in your tier depends on it.The trust center lists two subprocessors. Questionnaire work is also handled by SecurityPal analysts, who it says work from its own center in Kathmandu. | ## Pricing breakdown ### Loopio Enterprise quote-based pricing; no public self-serve tier. ### SecurityPal No pricing page or public prices. Three deployment models are labelled only by dollar signs: Basecamp (self-service AI software), Summit (AI plus certified analysts) and Everest (fully managed). You start with a sales call; no free plan or trial is listed. ## Who should pick Loopio **Loopio** is the pick for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. - A mature answer library: tagging, versioning, and review cycles that big teams lean on daily. - Unlimited projects and library entries on every plan, including the entry Foundations tier. - Broad integration catalog (Salesforce, Slack, Teams, Seismic, SharePoint), though industry integrations are paid add-ons. ## Who should pick SecurityPal **SecurityPal** is the pick for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. - A certified human analyst checks every answer, which suits teams that will not send unreviewed AI output. - Takes questionnaires in whatever format they arrive, including SIG, CAIQ and portals, with no reformatting by you. - Knowledge Library governance (owners, review cycles, version history) keeps answers from going stale. ## Final verdict These tools solve different problems, so the right pick depends on your priorities. In our capability model, Loopio leads on RFPs and DDQs, while SecurityPal leads on AI drafting and self-serve setup. Loopio has the edge on DDQs and security questionnaires combined in our capability model. Many teams also run a dedicated AI-drafting tool alongside their existing stack rather than switching wholesale. Read the full [Loopio review](/loopio) or [SecurityPal review](/securitypal), or browse [all RFP & DDQ software](/). ## Frequently asked questions What is the difference between Loopio and SecurityPal? Loopio: Content-library-first RFP response management. SecurityPal: Security questionnaires completed for you by AI plus certified analysts. Loopio is best for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. SecurityPal is best for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. Which is cheaper, Loopio or SecurityPal? Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so request quotes for the same scope before comparing cost. Is Loopio or SecurityPal better for DDQs and security questionnaires? Loopio scores higher on DDQ and security-questionnaire handling in our capability model, though both support them. Do Loopio and SecurityPal both handle RFPs? Loopio: yes, a core strength. SecurityPal: limited. Which should you choose, Loopio or SecurityPal? Loopio is the pick for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. SecurityPal is the pick for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. Are there alternatives to Loopio and SecurityPal? Yes. Browse the full directory of RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire platforms for more options and side-by-side comparisons. Do Loopio and SecurityPal list ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting? Loopio: ISO 27001 ISO 27001 (legal addendum), SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California), EU Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland), Slack Slack (NA and EU apps), Teams Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps), clouds AWS. SecurityPal: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Slack, Teams Microsoft Teams, clouds GCP. Confirm both on the vendor sites. ## Source registry Every page we read for these profiles, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the [corrections page](/corrections). ### [Loopio](/loopio) Pricing - [loopio.com/pricing](https://loopio.com/pricing/)Checked Oct 2026 · Limitation Security and compliance - [loopio.com/legal/infosec-addendum](https://loopio.com/legal/infosec-addendum/)Checked Aug 2026 · ISO 27001 - [loopio.com/platform/security](https://loopio.com/platform/security/)Checked Aug 2026 · SOC 2 · Hosting · Subprocessors - [slack.com/marketplace/AHV240S3C-loopio](https://slack.com/marketplace/AHV240S3C-loopio)Checked Aug 2026 · US hosting · Subprocessors · Slack - [slack.com/marketplace/A04DB06HK1U-loopio-eu](https://slack.com/marketplace/A04DB06HK1U-loopio-eu)Checked Aug 2026 · EU hosting Product and integrations - [support.loopio.com/hc/en-us/articles/6595343686803-How-Do-I-Get…](https://support.loopio.com/hc/en-us/articles/6595343686803-How-Do-I-Get-the-Microsoft-Teams-Integration)Checked Aug 2026 · Microsoft Teams Third-party reviews - [g2.com/products/loopio/reviews](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews)Checked Jul 2026 · G2 rating - [gartner.com/reviews/product/loopio](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/product/loopio)Checked Jul 2026 · Gartner rating - [capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/133042/Loopio/reviews/)Checked Oct 2026 · Capterra rating · Reviewer-reported limitation ### [SecurityPal](/securitypal) Pricing - [securitypalhq.com](https://www.securitypalhq.com/)Checked Oct 2026 · Pricing model · Starting price · Free tier · Plan tiers · Pricing note · Source attribution score · Workflow & approvals score · Integrations score · Integrations · Slack · Microsoft Teams · Limitation Security and compliance - [trust.securitypal.com](https://trust.securitypal.com/)Checked Oct 2026 · SOC 2 · Hosting · Subprocessors · Certifications Product and integrations - [securitypalhq.com/products/security-questionnaire-automation](https://www.securitypalhq.com/products/security-questionnaire-automation)Checked Oct 2026 · RFPs score · DDQs score · Security questionnaires score · AI drafting score · Integrations · Named customers · Limitation - [securitypalhq.com/products/knowledge-library](https://www.securitypalhq.com/products/knowledge-library)Checked Oct 2026 · Answer library score - [securitypalhq.com/get-started](https://www.securitypalhq.com/get-started)Checked Oct 2026 · Self-serve onboarding score - [securitypalhq.com/customers](https://www.securitypalhq.com/customers)Checked Oct 2026 · Named customers - [securitypalhq.com/company](https://www.securitypalhq.com/company)Checked Oct 2026 · Founded Third-party reviews - No review-site source recorded. Table of Contents - [Choose Loopio or SecurityPal](#choose-loopio-or-securitypal) - [Side-by-side comparison](#side-by-side-comparison) - [What they look like](#what-they-look-like) - [Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting](#security-iso-27001-soc-2-and-regional-hosting) - [Slack and Microsoft Teams](#slack-and-microsoft-teams) - [Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names](#subprocessors-the-big-three-clouds-then-the-niche-names) - [Pricing breakdown](#pricing-breakdown) - [Who should pick Loopio](#who-should-pick-loopio) - [Who should pick SecurityPal](#who-should-pick-securitypal) - [Final verdict](#final-verdict) - [Frequently asked questions](#frequently-asked-questions) - [Source registry](#source-registry) [Summarize with ChatGPT](https://chatgpt.com/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcomparisons%2Floopio-vs-securitypal-2026)[Summarize with Claude](https://claude.ai/new?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcomparisons%2Floopio-vs-securitypal-2026)[Summarize with Perplexity](https://www.perplexity.ai/?q=Summarize%20this%20article%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Frfp-software-tools.com%2Fcomparisons%2Floopio-vs-securitypal-2026) Share this article ## Related articles [**Conveyor vs Loopio (2026)**A side-by-side look at Conveyor and Loopio: pricing, capabilities, and who each is best for.RFP Software Tools · October 8, 2026](/comparisons/conveyor-vs-loopio-2026)[**1up vs Loopio (2026)**A side-by-side look at 1up and Loopio: pricing, capabilities, and who each is best for.RFP Software Tools · October 8, 2026](/comparisons/1up-vs-loopio-2026)[**AutogenAI vs Loopio (2026)**A side-by-side look at AutogenAI and Loopio: pricing, capabilities, and who each is best for.RFP Software Tools · October 8, 2026](/comparisons/autogenai-vs-loopio-2026)[**Loopio vs Steerlab (2026)**A side-by-side look at Loopio and Steerlab: pricing, capabilities, and who each is best for.RFP Software Tools · October 8, 2026](/comparisons/loopio-vs-steerlab-2026)