Quick verdict
Choose RequestFX for small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today; choose Sequesto for European bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price. RequestFX starts lower, at $299/mo against €750/mo for Sequesto. In our capability model RequestFX leads on self-serve setup, while Sequesto leads on integrations.
Both profiles reviewed Oct 2026
2 of 70 profiles, one scoring modelNo paid placementSources checked: 24Choose RequestFX or Sequesto
RE
Choose RequestFX when
- Small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today.
- You need stronger self-serve setup than Sequesto offers.
- You want the lower entry price: $299/mo.
SE
Choose Sequesto when
- European bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price.
- You need stronger integrations than RequestFX offers.
- RequestFX: Small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today.
- Sequesto: European bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price.
- Pricing: RequestFX $299/mo vs Sequesto €750/mo
Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | RequestFX | Sequesto | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today. | European bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price. | - |
| Starting price | $299/mo | €750/mo | RequestFX |
| Free tier | No | No | Match |
| RFPs | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| DDQs | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Security questionnaires | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| AI drafting | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Answer library | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Source attribution | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Workflow & approvals | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Integrations | 1/3 | 2/3 | Sequesto |
| Self-serve onboarding | 3/3 | 2/3 | RequestFX |
| ISO 27001 | Not listed | ISO 27001 | - |
| SOC 2 | Not listed | SOC 2 Type II | - |
| US hosting | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| EU hosting | Yes (EU only, Google Cloud) | Not listed | - |
| Slack | Not listed | Slack (mentions, approvals, reminders) | - |
| Microsoft Teams | Not listed | Microsoft Teams | - |
| AWS, Azure, GCP | GCP | Not listed | - |
| Listed integrations | Google Drive, SharePoint, Confluence, Jira | Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Attio, SharePoint, Google Drive, OneDrive, Box, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Notion, Seismic, Highspot, Door, Okta | - |
| Certifications | None listed | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | - |
What they look like
RE RequestFX
SE Sequesto
Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting
Put RequestFX and Sequesto through the same three questions a security reviewer will ask: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep the tenancy in the US or the EU. Cells say Not listed when we could not find the claim on a public vendor page.
| Check | RequestFX | Sequesto |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Not listed requestfx.com, 2026-10 The privacy policy says its hosting providers adhere to ISO 27001; no certificate for RequestFX itself is listed. | ISO 27001 sequesto.com, 2026-10 |
| SOC 2 | Not listed | SOC 2 Type II sequesto.com, 2026-10 |
| US hosting | Not listed | Not listed |
| EU hosting | Yes (EU only, Google Cloud) requestfx.com, 2026-10 | Not listed |
Slack and Microsoft Teams
During a live questionnaire, SMEs get pinged in Slack or Teams, not in a vendor portal. Here is what RequestFX and Sequesto publish for those two connections.
| Connection | RequestFX | Sequesto |
|---|---|---|
| Slack | Not listed | Slack (mentions, approvals, reminders) sequesto.com, 2026-10 Notification integrations are listed from the Scale plan. |
| Microsoft Teams | Not listed | Microsoft Teams sequesto.com, 2026-10 Notification integrations are listed from the Scale plan. |
Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names
Compare RequestFX and Sequesto on AWS, Azure and GCP first. Then scan for niche processors a reviewer should pause on: third-party LLMs, session replay, or support that leaves the region you elected.
| Layer | RequestFX | Sequesto |
|---|---|---|
| AWS, Azure, GCP | GCP | Not listed |
| Watch-outs | No niche processors flagged in our sourced list. The privacy policy also mentions unnamed third-party AI providers for generating responses. Ask which model providers process your content. | No niche processors flagged in our sourced list. |
Pricing breakdown
RequestFX
Growth is $299/mo with 2 editor seats and Scale up is $999/mo with 10, both with unlimited questionnaires and viewers. Enterprise (SSO, unlimited editors) is quoted, and a 14-day free trial is available.
Sequesto
Team is €750/mo billed annually with 3 users, and Scale is €2,500/mo billed annually with 15 users; extra users are €200/user/mo on both. Enterprise is a custom annual contract, and Team and Scale come with a 7-day free trial with no credit card.
Who should pick RequestFX
RequestFX is the pick for small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today.
- Published prices and a 14-day free trial, so you can test it on a real questionnaire before talking to anyone.
- Unlimited questionnaires and unlimited viewer seats on every paid plan; only editors are counted.
- Customer data is stored only on EU servers, per the privacy policy, and on-premise deployment is offered.
Who should pick Sequesto
Sequesto is the pick for european bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price.
- Published euro pricing, with onboarding included on every plan, is rare in a category that mostly hides behind demos.
- Every draft answer carries citations to its source documents, and the audit log records who reviewed and approved it.
- Covers UK public-sector formats (PQQ and ITT) next to RFPs and DDQs, plus SIG or CAIQ security questionnaires.
Final verdict
These tools solve different problems, so the right pick depends on your priorities. RequestFX is the lower-cost entry point ($299/mo). In our capability model, RequestFX leads on self-serve setup, while Sequesto leads on integrations. They are level on DDQs and security questionnaires combined in our capability model. Many teams also run a dedicated AI-drafting tool alongside their existing stack rather than switching wholesale.
Read the full RequestFX review or Sequesto review, or browse all RFP & DDQ software.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between RequestFX and Sequesto?
RequestFX: Self-serve AI questionnaire answering with EU-only data storage. Sequesto: Agent-run bid workspace for tenders and questionnaires, with published euro pricing. RequestFX is best for small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today. Sequesto is best for european bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price.
Which is cheaper, RequestFX or Sequesto?
RequestFX starts lower at $299/mo, versus €750/mo for Sequesto.
Is RequestFX or Sequesto better for DDQs and security questionnaires?
They are level on DDQ and security-questionnaire handling in our capability model, so test both on one of your own questionnaires.
Do RequestFX and Sequesto both handle RFPs?
RequestFX: yes, a core strength. Sequesto: yes, a core strength.
Which should you choose, RequestFX or Sequesto?
RequestFX is the pick for small B2B teams that want to start answering security questionnaires and spreadsheet RFPs on a published price today. Sequesto is the pick for european bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price.
Are there alternatives to RequestFX and Sequesto?
Yes. Browse the full directory of RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire platforms for more options and side-by-side comparisons.
Do RequestFX and Sequesto list ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?
RequestFX: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 Not listed, US Not listed, EU Yes (EU only, Google Cloud), Slack Not listed, Teams Not listed, clouds GCP. Sequesto: ISO 27001 ISO 27001, SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Slack (mentions, approvals, reminders), Teams Microsoft Teams, clouds Not listed. Confirm both on the vendor sites.
Source registry
Every page we read for these profiles, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the corrections page.
RequestFX
Pricing
Security and compliance
Product and integrations
Third-party reviews
Sequesto
Pricing
Security and compliance
Product and integrations
- sequesto.com/use-cases/itt-response
- sequesto.com/resources/integrations
- sequesto.com/use-cases/security
- sequesto.com/product/ai-agent
- sequesto.com/product/context-and-knowledge
- sequesto.com/product/bid-capabilities
- sequesto.com/free-trial
- sequesto.com/product/data-and-integrations
- sequesto.com/resources/press
- sequesto.com
Third-party reviews
- No review-site source recorded.