How the scoring works
Every point comes from one of your answers matched against a vendor record. Nothing is weighted by brand, popularity or who the vendor is. When two vendors tie, the one earlier in the alphabet shows first.
- Questionnaire types: up to 9 points per type you pick, from the directory's 0 to 3 capability rating times three. A vendor rated 0 on a type you need is left out.
- Team: small teams reward self-serve setup and a published price. Mid-sized teams reward review workflow and setup. Large teams reward review workflow (double) and answer-library depth.
- Buying style: "published price" and "try it free" are hard filters. "Happy to get a quote" changes nothing.
- Integrations: 3 points for each must-have the record names. Missing ones are listed as gaps, because a record can miss an integration the vendor does have.
- Security: 3 points for each need the record documents (SOC 2, ISO 27001, SSO, EU hosting, restricted deployment). Undocumented needs become gaps, never exclusions.
- AI-first or library-first: AI-first doubles the AI drafting and source attribution ratings. Library-first doubles the answer library rating and adds workflow and attribution. No preference adds all three once.
- Industry: 4 points when the vendor lists your industry, 1 when it is a general-purpose tool.
The fit percentage is the vendor's points as a share of the maximum possible for your answers. It ranks options against each other; it is not a quality grade. The data behind every factor is published in the RFP and DDQ software benchmark, and the capability ratings are explained on the methodology page.
What a shortlist cannot tell you
A record-based score narrows the field; it cannot tell you how a tool handles your questionnaire, your content or your reviewers. Treat the top 3 to 5 as the vendors to put through the same test: one completed questionnaire, one unseen one, and the people who will actually use it. The RFP evaluation scorecard keeps that comparison honest.