Best Quilt alternatives and competitors in 2026

Quilt alternatives at a glance

Why teams look for Quilt alternatives

Quilt sits in the RFP response category and suits solutions and presales teams that want questionnaire drafting and a Slack Q&A bot from one knowledge layer. These are the limitations that push teams to look around, each linked to the page we read it on.

• Quilt announced a merger with Rox, and quilt.app was not loading in October 2026. Rox's autofill page now redirects to its general platform page, so standalone availability is unconfirmed. quilt.app, 2026-10
• Team and Enterprise prices were never published. SSO with SCIM sat on Enterprise only, as did connectors for Notion, Confluence, Gong, and Chorus. quilt.app, 2026-10
• G2 reviewers (2024) say reviewing large sheets with several collaborators can be challenging, and that formatting and edit history are fairly inflexible. g2.com, 2026-10
• G2 reviewers (2024) asked for wider questionnaire format support such as PDF and Word, and noted that enterprise-grade reporting did not exist yet. g2.com, 2026-10

How to choose the right Quilt alternative

Start from the job, not the logo. Quilt is built for solutions-engineering teams at software companies who field RFPs and security questionnaires alongside a steady stream of internal "#ask" questions from reps. Stay if that matches your week. Switch if this limitation is a deal-breaker: Quilt announced a merger with Rox, and quilt.app was not loading in October 2026. Rox no longer shows a standalone Quilt product page. Also switch if workflow & approvals is central to how you work, since Quilt is light there.

Three checks decide most shortlists. First, questionnaire mix: RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires are different workloads, and a proposal-narrative tool will not save a 400-question SIG. Second, library vs draft: some platforms want a curated answer library before they pay off, others write from documents you already have. Third, buying motion: Quilt is freemium at $0 (free tier) (Its last published pricing page listed a Free plan (3 members, 20 questionnaires a month) plus Team and Enterprise plans sold through a demo with no listed price. Plans after the Rox merger are not published, so treat this as historical). If you need a published number or a self-serve trial, filter the list below on that before you book demos.

Rank below is job overlap (shared categories and tags, plus aligned capability scores), then name. It is not a universal crown. Details for Quilt were last verified Oct 2026.

If workflow & approvals is the job you actually run, Quilt is a weak match on that dimension (1/3). Shortlist the tools below that score higher there, then confirm on a real questionnaire rather than a vendor demo file. Pricing for Quilt is freemium at $0 (free tier); if that buying motion is the problem, filter the list for a published number or a self-serve path first. Then book the demo with your worst questionnaire, not theirs.

5 alternatives to Quilt, ranked

1. 1. 1up

   4.6/5 · $0 (free tier) · Self-serve AI for questionnaires and sales enablement

   1up is a self-serve AI knowledge platform that answers RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires and doubles as a sales-enablement answer engine.

   Best for: Sales teams that need questionnaire answers plus enablement in one self-serve tool. Compared with Quilt, pick 1up when sales teams that need to answer buyer questions and RFPs/DDQs fast, with answers surfaced right in their chat apps.

   What it actually does: Answers buyer questions from your existing knowledge; Automates RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires; Auto-fills web-based questionnaires.

   Strengths: Self-serve start: a free-forever plan, plus a free trial or buy-now on every paid tier. Starter and above include unlimited users and unlimited answers.

   Watch-outs: Questionnaire automations are capped by plan: 1 a month on Starter ($300/mo), 6 on Plus ($900/mo), more only on Enterprise.

   Versus Quilt: Matches Quilt on RFPs, DDQs, and answer library, and leads on AI drafting. Switch when those gaps match the job you actually run.

   Stack: Integrations listed: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, Salesforce, Google Drive, Confluence, SharePoint. Certifications: SOC 2, ISO 27001. Named customers in the vendor file: JumpCloud, WalkMe, Fleetio, Docebo.

   Pricing: freemium, $0 (free tier). Free-forever plan (1 admin, 50 answers/month). Paid tiers are flat monthly: MCP $50/mo plus pay-as-you-go automations ($5 per 100 answers), Starter $300/mo (unlimited users), Plus $900/mo; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing saves 15%, and paid plans have a free trial.

   Read the 1up review.

2. 2. Anchor

   4.3/5 · $125,000/yr · AI-native response platform for complex enterprise RFPs and questionnaires

   Anchor is an AI-native platform for RFPs and security questionnaires, with DDQs in scope too, built for presales and security teams on complex enterprise deals. It drafts cited answers from a self-maintaining knowledge base and sells on unlimited seats, with its one public price on AWS Marketplace.

   Best for: Enterprise sales and presales teams answering long, technical RFPs who want every teammate in the tool without seat fees. Compared with Quilt, pick Anchor when enterprise B2B teams where solutions engineers and security staff share the RFP and questionnaire load across messy Excel and PDF formats.

   What it actually does: AI drafts with a cited source on every answer; Knowledge base with no manual tagging, plus contradiction and gap detection; RFP summaries with risk flags for go/no-go calls.

   Strengths: Unlimited seats: its collaboration page and AWS listing both say there are no per-user charges, so SMEs can join without a licence fight. Every generated answer carries citations and source links, and the InfoSec page says each answer shows its source and review date.

   Watch-outs: The only public price is a $125,000 Enterprise Plan for a 12-month contract on AWS Marketplace, sized on about 150 questions per opportunity.

   Versus Quilt: Matches Quilt on RFPs, DDQs, AI drafting, and answer library. Switch when those gaps match the job you actually run.

   Stack: Integrations listed: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce Sales Cloud, Microsoft SharePoint, Confluence, Google Drive, Google Chrome. Certifications: SOC 2 Type II. Named customers in the vendor file: Papaya Global, Coralogix, Bruker, BioCatch.

   Pricing: quote-only, $125,000/yr. The only public price is an Enterprise Plan on AWS Marketplace at $125,000 for a 12-month contract, sized on an average of 150 questions per opportunity, with unlimited seats. Anchor says Enterprise plans are custom, and its own site routes buyers to a demo.

   Read the Anchor review.

3. 3. Steerlab

   4.2/5 · Custom · Paris-built AI for RFPs and security questionnaires, with a self-maintaining library

   Steerlab is a Paris-based, AI-native platform that drafts sourced answers to RFPs and security questionnaires for B2B presales teams. It pairs drafting with a content library that cleans itself up, plus a Go/No-Go agent for bid decisions.

   Best for: B2B software presales teams that want sourced AI drafts on RFPs and security questionnaires without curating a Q&A library by hand. Compared with Quilt, pick Steerlab when presales and proposal teams at B2B software companies (security teams too), especially EU-based ones that want their data hosted in Europe.

   What it actually does: AI drafts with linked source documents and a confidence score on each answer; Auto-managed content library that deduplicates content and flags outdated answers; Go/No-Go agent with win probability and competitor bias detection.

   Strengths: You can test it on real work first: the free trial covers your first RFP or questionnaire with no credit card. Each drafted answer links its source documents and carries a confidence score, and Steerlab says it flags unknowns instead of inventing an answer.

   Watch-outs: No public price list: the pricing URL returns a 404, so every paid plan is quoted after a demo.

   Versus Quilt: Matches Quilt on RFPs, AI drafting, and answer library, and is lighter on DDQs. Switch when those gaps match the job you actually run.

   Stack: Integrations listed: Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Box, Confluence, Notion, Google Chrome, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID. Certifications: SOC 2. Named customers in the vendor file: Playable, beqom, Staffbase, Gladia.

   Pricing: quote-only, Custom. No public price list: steerlab.ai/pricing returns a 404 and paid plans are quoted after a demo. The free trial covers your first RFP or questionnaire with no credit card required. Capterra reviewers score it 5/5 from 1 reviews as of Oct 2026.

   Read the Steerlab review, or the live Steerlab vs Quilt comparison.

4. 4. Sequesto

   4.3/5 · €750/mo · Agent-run bid workspace for tenders and questionnaires, with published euro pricing

   Sequesto is a Belgian AI platform for bid and tender teams: an orchestrating agent called James drafts cited answers from your knowledge sources while configurable workflows route review and approval. Plans are published in euros from €750 a month.

   Best for: European bid and tender teams that want agent drafting plus configurable review workflows at a published price. Compared with Quilt, pick Sequesto when bid managers in regulated European businesses, such as life sciences or financial services, who answer tenders and security questionnaires side by side.

   What it actually does: James, an orchestrating agent that hands extraction and drafting to specialist sub-agents; Cited draft answers with a confidence score on security questionnaires; Knowledge Hub that takes approved answers back in for the next project.

   Strengths: Published euro pricing, with onboarding included on every plan, is rare in a category that mostly hides behind demos. Every draft answer carries citations to its source documents, and the audit log records who reviewed and approved it.

   Watch-outs: Team (€750/mo billed annually) includes only 3 users and 2 MCP integrations; extra users cost €200/user/mo.

   Versus Quilt: Matches Quilt on RFPs, DDQs, AI drafting, and answer library. Switch when those gaps match the job you actually run.

   Stack: Integrations listed: Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Attio, SharePoint, Google Drive, OneDrive, Box, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Notion, Seismic, Highspot, Door, Okta. Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. Named customers in the vendor file: Barona, delaware, ISS Facility Services, Oodrive.

   Pricing: flat-rate, €750/mo. Team is €750/mo billed annually with 3 users, and Scale is €2,500/mo billed annually with 15 users; extra users are €200/user/mo on both. Enterprise is a custom annual contract, and Team and Scale come with a 7-day free trial with no credit card.

   Read the Sequesto review.

5. 5. SiftHub

   4.5/5 · Custom · AI sales assistant for presales DDQs and questionnaires

   SiftHub is an AI-native platform for B2B SaaS presales teams, focused on answering DDQs and security questionnaires quickly from existing knowledge.

   Best for: B2B SaaS presales teams handling DDQs and security questionnaires. Compared with Quilt, pick SiftHub when B2B SaaS presales and revenue teams answering DDQs and security questionnaires from existing knowledge.

   What it actually does: Automated RFP and questionnaire completion; Real-time answers for sales reps; Tailored proposals and sales collateral.

   Strengths: Presales-focused AI answering Strong on DDQs and security questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ, VSAQ)

   Watch-outs: Consumption pricing: answers and proposals use transactions at rates that vary with complexity, and there is no free trial.

   Versus Quilt: Matches Quilt on RFPs and answer library, and leads on DDQs and AI drafting. Switch when those gaps match the job you actually run.

   Stack: Integrations listed: Slack, Salesforce, Confluence. Certifications: SOC 2, ISO 27001. Named customers in the vendor file: Superhuman, Sirion, Zycus, Rocketlane.

   Pricing: quote-only, Custom. No public prices. Custom quotes for the RFP Agent or the full platform, on a transaction-based consumption model (answers, proposals and insights consume transactions). No free trial.

   Read the SiftHub review.

See all 45 RFP response tools for the full list, sorted A to Z with scores and prices.

More ways to compare Quilt

Profiles for every tool on this list live in the directory. Start with Quilt, then the three cards below if you want a faster scan.

Run two tools on the same real questionnaire before you replace Quilt. Score the first draft, whether answers cite a source you trust, and whether export lands in the buyer's original file. Quilt is the right keep for solutions and presales teams that want questionnaire drafting and a Slack Q&A bot from one knowledge layer. It is the wrong keep if this limitation decides it: Quilt announced a merger with Rox, and quilt.app was not loading in October 2026. Rox no longer shows a standalone Quilt product page. The closest swap on the job is 1up; the live head-to-head on this site is Quilt vs Savix.

1U1upSelf-serve AI for questionnaires and sales enablementRFP ResponseDDQSecurity Questionnaires1up is a self-serve AI knowledge platform that answers RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires and doubles as a sales-enablement answer engine.from $0 (free tier)4.6ANAnchorAI-native response platform for complex enterprise RFPs and questionnairesRFP ResponseDDQSecurity QuestionnairesAnchor is an AI-native platform for RFPs and security questionnaires, with DDQs in scope too, built for presales and security teams on complex enterprise deals. It drafts cited answers from a self-maintaining knowledge base and sells on unlimited seats, with its one public price on AWS Marketplace.from $125,000/yr4.3STSteerlabParis-built AI for RFPs and security questionnaires, with a self-maintaining libraryRFP ResponseSecurity QuestionnairesAI-NativeSteerlab is a Paris-based, AI-native platform that drafts sourced answers to RFPs and security questionnaires for B2B presales teams. It pairs drafting with a content library that cleans itself up, plus a Go/No-Go agent for bid decisions.from Custom4.2