Quick verdict
Choose Cone for accounting and bookkeeping firms that want proposals and practice management together; choose QuoteWerks for teams that quote configurable products and value pricing control over polish. Cone starts lower, at $9/user/mo against $15/user/mo for QuoteWerks. In our capability model Cone leads on self-serve setup, while QuoteWerks leads on approval workflows and integrations.
Both profiles reviewed Oct 2026
2 of 70 profiles, one scoring modelNo paid placementSources checked: 11Choose Cone or QuoteWerks
CO
Choose Cone when
- Accounting and bookkeeping firms that want proposals and practice management together.
- You need stronger self-serve setup than QuoteWerks offers.
- You want the lower entry price: $9/user/mo.
QU
Choose QuoteWerks when
- Teams that quote configurable products and value pricing control over polish.
- You need stronger approval workflows and integrations than Cone offers.
Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Cone | QuoteWerks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Accounting and bookkeeping firms that want proposals and practice management together. | Teams that quote configurable products and value pricing control over polish. | - |
| Starting price | $9/user/mo | $15/user/mo | Cone |
| Free tier | No | No | Match |
| RFPs | 0/3 | 0/3 | Match |
| DDQs | 0/3 | 0/3 | Match |
| Security questionnaires | 0/3 | 0/3 | Match |
| AI drafting | 0/3 | 0/3 | Match |
| Answer library | 1/3 | 1/3 | Match |
| Source attribution | 0/3 | 0/3 | Match |
| Workflow & approvals | 1/3 | 3/3 | QuoteWerks |
| Integrations | 2/3 | 3/3 | QuoteWerks |
| Self-serve onboarding | 3/3 | 2/3 | Cone |
| ISO 27001 | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| SOC 2 | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| US hosting | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| EU hosting | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| Slack | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| Microsoft Teams | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| AWS, Azure, GCP | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| Listed integrations | QuickBooks, Xero, Stripe | Salesforce, QuickBooks, ConnectWise | - |
| Certifications | None listed | None listed | - |
What they look like
CO
Cone

QU
QuoteWerks

Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting
Put Cone and QuoteWerks through the same three questions a security reviewer will ask: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep the tenancy in the US or the EU. Cells say Not listed when we could not find the claim on a public vendor page.
| Check | Cone | QuoteWerks |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Not listed | Not listed |
| SOC 2 | Not listed | Not listed |
| US hosting | Not listed | Not listed |
| EU hosting | Not listed | Not listed |
Slack and Microsoft Teams
During a live questionnaire, SMEs get pinged in Slack or Teams, not in a vendor portal. Here is what Cone and QuoteWerks publish for those two connections.
| Connection | Cone | QuoteWerks |
|---|---|---|
| Slack | Not listed | Not listed |
| Microsoft Teams | Not listed | Not listed |
Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names
Compare Cone and QuoteWerks on AWS, Azure and GCP first. Then scan for niche processors a reviewer should pause on: third-party LLMs, session replay, or support that leaves the region you elected.
| Layer | Cone | QuoteWerks |
|---|---|---|
| AWS, Azure, GCP | Not listed | Not listed |
| Watch-outs | No niche processors flagged in our sourced list. | No niche processors flagged in our sourced list. |
It is hard to find two proposal tools with less overlap in their customer lists. Cone is built for accounting and bookkeeping firms: it turns a fee proposal into an engagement letter, then into recurring invoices and collected payments, with practice management on the side. QuoteWerks is built for companies that resell and install things (IT and managed service providers, audio-visual integrators, security installers) and need quotes made of catalog items, margins and labor, followed by purchase orders.
If you run an accounting practice, Cone is the more natural fit and QuoteWerks would be a strange purchase. If you quote hardware and services from distributor catalogs, QuoteWerks fits and Cone would not get you past the first bill of materials. The rest of this page explains the reasoning, the costs and the documented gotchas, so you can confirm which camp you are in.
Key takeaways
- Different trades: Cone serves accountants and bookkeepers (proposals, engagement letters, billing, payments, practice management). QuoteWerks serves resellers and integrators (line-item quotes, bundles, distributor pricing, procurement).
- Pricing: Cone Propose starts at $9/user/mo billed annually ($13 monthly), with Cone Practice from $5/user/mo on Starter (no proposals). QuoteWerks counts concurrent users rather than named ones, from $15 a month on Desktop and $50 to $102 a month on the Web product.
- After the yes: Cone turns an accepted proposal into billing and project kick-off. QuoteWerks turns an accepted quote into purchase orders and, on Pinnacle, procurement tracking.
- Integrations: Cone connects to QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Books, Stripe and GoCardless. QuoteWerks connects to CRMs, MSP platforms such as ConnectWise and Autotask, accounting packages and distributors.
- Ratings (July 2026): Cone has 34 G2 reviews averaging 4.9. QuoteWerks averages 4.6 across 192 Capterra reviews and 4.4 across 205 on G2.
- Limitations: extra client signers cost more on Cone, and its automated billing is a Growth-plan feature. QuoteWerks gates e-signature and payments to its Balanced tier and has no SOC 2 report.
Two trades, two kinds of price
The deepest difference is what a “price” means in each business.
For an accounting firm, a price is a fee schedule: monthly bookkeeping, a year-end accounts package, payroll per employee, a one-off tax return, perhaps tiered options so the client can choose. The proposal has to explain scope, set terms in an engagement letter, and lead straight into recurring billing. Most of the revenue comes from repeating work, so the important moment is the one after the client signs, when billing has to start without someone retyping it.
For a reseller or MSP, a price is a bill of materials: 25 laptops at a distributor cost plus margin, licences on a subscription term, a firewall, cabling, 40 hours of project labor, an optional extended warranty. Costs move with distributor pricing, margins must hold, and the accepted quote has to become purchase orders. The important moment is accuracy at the line level.
Cone is designed around the first moment. QuoteWerks is designed around the second. That is the whole comparison in two paragraphs, and everything below is detail.
What Cone does with a proposal
Cone, founded in 2022 and based in Hyderabad, India, sells two products. Cone Propose covers proposals, quotes, e-signatures, invoicing and payments. Cone Practice adds practice management for accounting firms, with the client portal, client requests and team task tracking. Its pricing page lists unlimited clients and proposals on every Propose plan, a flexible proposal editor, pricing tables and quotes, templates, engagement letters, and integrations with QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho Books, Stripe and GoCardless.
Once a client accepts, Cone invoices from the proposal, and on the Growth plan it automates billing, collects payments and sends client reminders. Payment methods include card, invoice payment links, ACH in the US and direct debit in the UK. Cone says it adds no transaction fees beyond the payment gateway’s. UK firms get extras such as a Companies House integration and Xama AML checks.
Named customers include Beans Accounting, Drive Accountants and GreatWestCPAS. Cone is a small company: its Y Combinator listing shows a team of 8. That is worth knowing for support expectations, and it has not stopped the product collecting a 4.9 rating on G2.
What QuoteWerks does with a quote
QuoteWerks has been sold by Aspire Technologies, Inc. of Orlando, Florida, since 1993. The web product’s Essential tier already covers unlimited quotes and named users, bundles and a configurator, optional and substitute items, purchase orders, leasing calculations, a document audit trail, quote revisions, peer review and approvals, SSO, all CRM and PSA integrations, and Zapier. Balanced adds QuoteValet, which handles online acceptance, e-signature, view tracking, and card and ACH payments. Pinnacle adds automatic US sales tax rates, IT and MSP distributor content, an Amazon Business integration and procurement tracking.
Named customers include Scholastic, Honeywell and Ecolab. The installed base leans toward IT channel companies, and the integration list shows it: ConnectWise, Autotask, HaloPSA and Kaseya BMS sit next to Salesforce, HubSpot and Zoho CRM.
Price per person, side by side
Verified pricing as of October 2026:
- Cone, from $9/user/mo: Cone Propose costs $9 a user each month on annual billing or $13 month to month, and the 14-day trial asks for no card. Cone Practice begins at $5 a user per month annually on its Starter plan, which does not include proposals.
- QuoteWerks, from $15/user/mo: pricing follows concurrent users, which leaves named users unlimited. On Desktop, Standard, Professional and Corporate cost $15, $21 and $30 per user monthly, or you can buy a one-time licence from $199. On the Web, the three tiers span $50 to $102 per concurrent user monthly, discounted for annual billing. There is a free trial.
Cone’s Growth plan is $12/user/mo billed annually ($18 monthly). A six-person team that sends proposals and wants automated billing and payment collection:
| Setup | Monthly cost |
|---|---|
| Cone Propose Growth, 6 users, billed annually | 6 × $12 = $72 |
| Cone Propose Essentials, 6 users, billed annually (no automated billing) | 6 × $9 = $54 |
| QuoteWerks Web Balanced, 2 concurrent users, billed annually | 2 × $71.50 = $143 |
| QuoteWerks Web Essential, 2 concurrent users, monthly (no e-signature) | 2 × $50 = $100 |
Cone is cheaper per head, and it is aimed at a cheaper job. QuoteWerks costs more because its quote engine does more, and concurrent licensing softens that if only a few people quote at once. Add-ons shift both totals: Cone charges per user for multiple signers and for multiple pricing packages, and QuoteWerks sells QuickBooks Online integration at $20 a site, VendorRFQ at $20 a user, and on Desktop, QuoteValet at $28 a user per month.
Cone’s pricing page also says firms with more than 20 people should contact sales.
Integrations: the ledger versus the PSA
Each tool connects to the system its customers live in.
Cone connects to the ledger. QuickBooks Online, Xero and Zoho Books for invoices and client records, Stripe and GoCardless for payments, plus Google Drive, OneDrive, SharePoint, Gmail and Outlook. Zapier and custom email sending are on Growth. There is no CRM integration in our records, which is consistent with firms that run client relationships out of the practice system itself.
QuoteWerks connects to the operations stack. PSA platforms for MSPs, CRMs for the sales team, QuickBooks and Sage 50 for accounting, distributors for pricing and ordering. QuoteWerks says it offers more than 115 integrations. The web tiers include every CRM and PSA integration; the Desktop editions split them across Professional and Corporate.
Support and vendor size
This is a fair question to ask of any small-business software, and the two vendors sit at opposite ends.
Cone’s pricing page lists email and in-app support with a 48-hour response time on Essentials and 24 hours on Growth, plus a help center. For a firm sending proposals in January, a two-day reply window is worth planning around.
QuoteWerks offers phone and email support on its web plans, paid professional services at $100 an hour (remote only), and an optional accelerated implementation that the company says typically takes 1.5 to 2.5 hours. Desktop customers need the Update Maintenance Program for new releases and email support.
Edge cases: firms that sit in between
A few businesses genuinely straddle the line, and they are the only readers for whom this is a close call.
An accounting firm that also resells software subscriptions (cloud accounting licences, payroll add-ons) can usually list those as line items in a Cone pricing table next to its fees. That works while the list stays short and prices are fixed. If the firm starts quoting dozens of products with changing costs and margins, it has become a reseller, and the quoting job has outgrown a practice tool.
An MSP whose revenue is mostly monthly managed-service retainers has more in common with an accounting practice than a hardware dealer: the proposal sets a monthly fee and billing should follow automatically. QuoteWerks still has the advantage here because it connects to the PSA that runs the rest of the MSP’s operation, and the occasional hardware refresh will need the catalog anyway.
A bookkeeping firm that wins work through formal tenders needs a response tool for the tender itself, and Cone for the engagement after it wins.
Running a trial that tells you something
Both vendors offer a free trial, so test the part of the workflow that matters most to your trade.
In Cone’s 14-day trial, build your three most common fee proposals, including one with tiered options, and connect QuickBooks Online or Xero. Accept one as a test client and watch what happens next: does the invoice appear with the right recurring schedule, and does the engagement letter carry the right terms? If you plan to use Growth, test a payment through Stripe or GoCardless and the reminder flow. If two partners need to sign, remember that multiple signers is a paid add-on.
In the QuoteWerks trial, rebuild a real quote from last month: same products, same bundle, same labor lines. Connect the CRM or PSA you actually use, and check that the quote syncs back with the right values. If you plan on Pinnacle, test distributor content for the items you buy most. Then send the quote through QuoteValet (Balanced) to a colleague and accept it on a phone. The time it takes to rebuild that one quote tells you more than any demo.
Neither one answers RFPs
Neither of these tools reads a buyer’s RFP or questionnaire and drafts answers to it. An accounting firm responding to a public-sector tender for audit services, or an MSP answering a client’s security questionnaire, will need a separate response tool. That is fine: neither vendor claims otherwise, and both are honest about who they serve.
Known issues and watch-outs
Cone
- Multiple signers cost extra. The Cone pricing page (checked October 2026) lists multiple client signers as a per-user paid add-on on every plan ($2/user/mo monthly or $17/user/yr annually).
- Automation sits on Growth. Automated billing and payment collection, client reminders and Zapier are Growth features, per the pricing page.
- Client portal needs Cone Practice. The portal and client requests are listed under Cone Practice, not the Propose plans (pricing page).
- No refund on annual cancellation. Cancelling an annual plan keeps access to the end of the cycle without refunding the remainder (pricing page FAQ).
- Branding and support differ by plan. Essentials keeps the Cone badge on proposals and emails and lists a 48-hour support response (pricing page).
QuoteWerks
- E-signature and payments are a tier up. The QuoteWerks pricing page places them on the $78 Balanced web tier; Desktop users pay $28 each per month for QuoteValet instead.
- Desktop edition gates. The Desktop price list puts CRM links on Professional and PSA links on Corporate; Standard links only to its own contact database and Outlook.
- No SOC 2 report. The QuoteWerks security page cites NIST Cybersecurity Framework alignment, and there is no SOC 1 or SOC 2 attestation.
- Interface and learning curve. Two Capterra reviewers, writing in December 2024 and April 2026, flag a dated interface and a template editor that takes a while to master.
What each does well
Cone gives a small accounting practice one place for the fee proposal, the engagement letter, the invoice and the payment, at a price that is easy to justify per person, with unlimited clients and proposals on every plan. The 14-day trial without a card is low-risk, and the UK-specific extras show a vendor paying attention to its market.
QuoteWerks has thirty-plus years of quoting depth, concurrent licensing that makes occasional users cheap, approvals and audit trails on every web tier, and integrations that match how MSPs and integrators actually run. For a reseller, that depth is the product.
Who should pick Cone
- You run an accounting, bookkeeping or tax practice.
- Your proposals are fee schedules that lead into recurring billing.
- You use QuickBooks Online, Xero or Zoho Books and want invoices to flow from accepted proposals.
- You want practice management and a client portal from the same vendor, with Cone Practice.
- A 24 to 48 hour support window works for you.
Who should pick QuoteWerks
- You resell and install hardware, software or systems and quote from catalogs.
- You need bundles, optional items, margins, purchase orders and distributor pricing.
- Your business runs on a PSA such as ConnectWise or Autotask, or a CRM such as Salesforce or HubSpot.
- Several people quote occasionally, so concurrent licensing saves money.
- Your customers do not require a SOC 2 report from your quoting vendor.
Verdict
Your trade decides this one. Accounting and bookkeeping firms should pick Cone, starting on Propose Growth if they want billing and payment collection to run on their own, and adding Cone Practice if they want the client portal. Resellers, MSPs and integrators should pick QuoteWerks, starting on the Balanced web tier if customers need to accept and pay online.
If you are an accounting firm considering QuoteWerks, or an MSP considering Cone, you are probably reading the wrong comparison, and that is a useful thing to find out before the free trial ends.
Read the full Cone review or QuoteWerks review, or browse all RFP & DDQ software.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Cone and QuoteWerks?
Cone: Proposals and practice management for accountants. QuoteWerks: Long-running quoting and proposal software. Cone is best for accounting and bookkeeping firms that want proposals and practice management together. QuoteWerks is best for teams that quote configurable products and value pricing control over polish.
Which is cheaper, Cone or QuoteWerks?
Cone starts lower at $9/user/mo, versus $15/user/mo for QuoteWerks.
Is Cone or QuoteWerks better for DDQs and security questionnaires?
They are level on DDQ and security-questionnaire handling in our capability model, so test both on one of your own questionnaires.
Do Cone and QuoteWerks both handle RFPs?
Cone: limited. QuoteWerks: limited.
Which should you choose, Cone or QuoteWerks?
Cone is the pick for accounting and bookkeeping firms that want proposals and practice management together. QuoteWerks is the pick for teams that quote configurable products and value pricing control over polish.
Are there alternatives to Cone and QuoteWerks?
Yes. Browse the full directory of RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire platforms for more options and side-by-side comparisons.
Do Cone and QuoteWerks list ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?
Cone: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 Not listed, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Not listed, Teams Not listed, clouds Not listed. QuoteWerks: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 Not listed, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Not listed, Teams Not listed, clouds Not listed. Confirm both on the vendor sites.
Source registry
Every page we read for these profiles, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the corrections page.
Cone
Pricing
Security and compliance
- No security source URL recorded. Treat certifications and hosting as not publicly disclosed.
Product and integrations
Third-party reviews
QuoteWerks
Security and compliance
- No security source URL recorded. Treat certifications and hosting as not publicly disclosed.
Product and integrations