Quick verdict
Choose Loopio for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library; choose SecurityPal for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so quote both on the same scope. In our capability model Loopio leads on RFPs and DDQs, while SecurityPal leads on AI drafting and self-serve setup.
Both profiles reviewed Jul 2026
2 of 70 profiles, one scoring modelNo paid placementSources checked: 16Choose Loopio or SecurityPal
LO
Choose Loopio when
- Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library.
- You need stronger RFPs and DDQs than SecurityPal offers.
SE
Choose SecurityPal when
- Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one.
- You need stronger AI drafting and self-serve setup than Loopio offers.
- Loopio: Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library.
- SecurityPal: Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one.
- Pricing: Loopio Custom (~$20K+/yr est.) vs SecurityPal Custom
Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Loopio | SecurityPal | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. | Teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one. | - |
| Starting price | Custom (~$20K+/yr est.) | Custom | Match |
| Free tier | No | No | Match |
| RFPs | 3/3 | 1/3 | Loopio |
| DDQs | 3/3 | 2/3 | Loopio |
| Security questionnaires | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| AI drafting | 2/3 | 3/3 | SecurityPal |
| Answer library | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Source attribution | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Workflow & approvals | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Integrations | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Self-serve onboarding | 0/3 | 1/3 | SecurityPal |
| ISO 27001 | ISO 27001 (legal addendum) | Not listed | - |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II | - |
| US hosting | Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California) | Not listed | - |
| EU hosting | Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland) | Not listed | - |
| Slack | Slack (NA and EU apps) | Slack | - |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps) | Microsoft Teams | - |
| AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS | GCP | - |
| Listed integrations | Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Seismic, SharePoint | Salesforce, Okta, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Confluence, HubSpot, Google Drive | - |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | - |
What they look like
LO Loopio
SE SecurityPal
Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting
Put Loopio and SecurityPal through the same three questions a security reviewer will ask: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep the tenancy in the US or the EU. Cells say Not listed when we could not find the claim on a public vendor page.
| Check | Loopio | SecurityPal |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | ISO 27001 (legal addendum) loopio.com, 2026-08 Loopio legal addenda cite ISO 27001 and ISO 9001. The public security page describes an ISMS based on ISO 27001 rather than showing a certificate badge. | Not listed |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II loopio.com, 2026-08 | SOC 2 Type II trust.securitypal.com, 2026-10 Latest announced attestation covers July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 with zero exceptions; a 2026 bridge letter is listed. Report available on request. |
| US hosting | Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California) slack.com, 2026-08 | Not listed |
| EU hosting | Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland) slack.com, 2026-08 | Not listed |
Slack and Microsoft Teams
During a live questionnaire, SMEs get pinged in Slack or Teams, not in a vendor portal. Here is what Loopio and SecurityPal publish for those two connections.
| Connection | Loopio | SecurityPal |
|---|---|---|
| Slack | Slack (NA and EU apps) slack.com, 2026-08 | Slack securitypalhq.com, 2026-10 |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps) loopio.com, 2026-08 | Microsoft Teams securitypalhq.com, 2026-10 |
Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names
Compare Loopio and SecurityPal on AWS, Azure and GCP first. Then scan for niche processors a reviewer should pause on: third-party LLMs, session replay, or support that leaves the region you elected.
| Layer | Loopio | SecurityPal |
|---|---|---|
| AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS | GCP |
| Watch-outs |
Loopio does not publish a full named subprocessor table on its public security page. Confirm the current list in the DPA or during security review. |
The trust center lists two subprocessors. Questionnaire work is also handled by SecurityPal analysts, who it says work from its own center in Kathmandu. |
Pricing breakdown
Loopio
Enterprise quote-based pricing; no public self-serve tier.
SecurityPal
No pricing page or public prices. Three deployment models are labelled only by dollar signs: Basecamp (self-service AI software), Summit (AI plus certified analysts) and Everest (fully managed). You start with a sales call; no free plan or trial is listed.
Who should pick Loopio
Loopio is the pick for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library.
- A mature answer library: tagging, versioning, and review cycles that big teams lean on daily.
- Unlimited projects and library entries on every plan, including the entry Foundations tier.
- Broad integration catalog (Salesforce, Slack, Teams, Seismic, SharePoint), though industry integrations are paid add-ons.
Who should pick SecurityPal
SecurityPal is the pick for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one.
- A certified human analyst checks every answer, which suits teams that will not send unreviewed AI output.
- Takes questionnaires in whatever format they arrive, including SIG, CAIQ and portals, with no reformatting by you.
- Knowledge Library governance (owners, review cycles, version history) keeps answers from going stale.
Final verdict
These tools solve different problems, so the right pick depends on your priorities. In our capability model, Loopio leads on RFPs and DDQs, while SecurityPal leads on AI drafting and self-serve setup. Loopio has the edge on DDQs and security questionnaires combined in our capability model. Many teams also run a dedicated AI-drafting tool alongside their existing stack rather than switching wholesale.
Read the full Loopio review or SecurityPal review, or browse all RFP & DDQ software.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Loopio and SecurityPal?
Loopio: Content-library-first RFP response management. SecurityPal: Security questionnaires completed for you by AI plus certified analysts. Loopio is best for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. SecurityPal is best for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one.
Which is cheaper, Loopio or SecurityPal?
Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so request quotes for the same scope before comparing cost.
Is Loopio or SecurityPal better for DDQs and security questionnaires?
Loopio scores higher on DDQ and security-questionnaire handling in our capability model, though both support them.
Do Loopio and SecurityPal both handle RFPs?
Loopio: yes, a core strength. SecurityPal: limited.
Which should you choose, Loopio or SecurityPal?
Loopio is the pick for large enterprise teams with high response volume and a mature content library. SecurityPal is the pick for teams that want security questionnaires taken off their plate, with a named analyst accountable for each one.
Are there alternatives to Loopio and SecurityPal?
Yes. Browse the full directory of RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire platforms for more options and side-by-side comparisons.
Do Loopio and SecurityPal list ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?
Loopio: ISO 27001 ISO 27001 (legal addendum), SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Yes (AWS Northern Virginia; DR in Northern California), EU Yes (Loopio EU on AWS Ireland), Slack Slack (NA and EU apps), Teams Microsoft Teams (NA and EU apps), clouds AWS. SecurityPal: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Slack, Teams Microsoft Teams, clouds GCP. Confirm both on the vendor sites.
Source registry
Every page we read for these profiles, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the corrections page.
Loopio
Pricing
Security and compliance
Product and integrations
SecurityPal
Pricing
Security and compliance
Product and integrations
Third-party reviews
- No review-site source recorded.