Quick verdict
Choose Conveyor for security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place; choose Tribble for enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge. Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so quote both on the same scope. In our capability model Conveyor leads on security questionnaires and self-serve setup, while Tribble leads on RFPs and DDQs.
Both profiles reviewed Oct 2026
2 of 70 profiles, one scoring modelNo paid placementSources checked: 22Choose Conveyor or Tribble
CO
Choose Conveyor when
- Security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place.
- You need stronger security questionnaires and self-serve setup than Tribble offers.
- You want a free tier before you commit.
TR
Choose Tribble when
- Enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge.
- You need stronger RFPs and DDQs than Conveyor offers.
- Conveyor: Security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place.
- Tribble: Enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge.
- Pricing: Conveyor Custom vs Tribble Custom
Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Conveyor | Tribble | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place. | Enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge. | - |
| Starting price | Custom | Custom | Match |
| Free tier | Yes | No | Conveyor |
| RFPs | 2/3 | 3/3 | Tribble |
| DDQs | 1/3 | 3/3 | Tribble |
| Security questionnaires | 3/3 | 2/3 | Conveyor |
| AI drafting | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Answer library | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Source attribution | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Workflow & approvals | 2/3 | 2/3 | Match |
| Integrations | 3/3 | 3/3 | Match |
| Self-serve onboarding | 2/3 | 1/3 | Conveyor |
| ISO 27001 | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II | - |
| US hosting | Yes (United States) | Not listed | - |
| EU hosting | Not listed | Not listed | - |
| Slack | Slack (notifications, self-serve answers, questionnaire intake) | Slack | - |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (notifications) | Microsoft Teams | - |
| AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS, GCP | Not listed | - |
| Listed integrations | Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Zendesk, DocuSign, Google Drive, SharePoint, Confluence, Notion | Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gong, Google Drive, SharePoint, Confluence | - |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II | - |
What they look like
CO Conveyor
TR Tribble
Security: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and regional hosting
Put Conveyor and Tribble through the same three questions a security reviewer will ask: ISO 27001, SOC 2, and whether you can keep the tenancy in the US or the EU. Cells say Not listed when we could not find the claim on a public vendor page.
| Check | Conveyor | Tribble |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Not listed | Not listed |
| SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II trust.conveyor.com, 2026-10 Annual SOC 2 Type II audits covering Security, Availability and Confidentiality, per trust center announcements. | SOC 2 Type II |
| US hosting | Yes (United States) trust.conveyor.com, 2026-10 | Not listed |
| EU hosting | Not listed | Not listed |
Slack and Microsoft Teams
During a live questionnaire, SMEs get pinged in Slack or Teams, not in a vendor portal. Here is what Conveyor and Tribble publish for those two connections.
| Connection | Conveyor | Tribble |
|---|---|---|
| Slack | Slack (notifications, self-serve answers, questionnaire intake) docs.conveyor.com, 2026-10 | Slack |
| Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams (notifications) docs.conveyor.com, 2026-10 | Microsoft Teams |
Subprocessors: the big three clouds, then the niche names
Compare Conveyor and Tribble on AWS, Azure and GCP first. Then scan for niche processors a reviewer should pause on: third-party LLMs, session replay, or support that leaves the region you elected.
| Layer | Conveyor | Tribble |
|---|---|---|
| AWS, Azure, GCP | AWS, GCP | Not listed |
| Watch-outs |
The public trust center lists 27 subprocessors with processing locations (last updated July 14, 2026). | No niche processors flagged in our sourced list. |
Pricing breakdown
Conveyor
Free plan is a trust center only (10 Trust Center credits a month, up to 15 documents, no questionnaire automation or integrations). Enterprise is a custom quote billed on usage with volume discounts: unlimited users and seats, integrations included, no per-user fees.
Tribble
No public prices. Respond (RFPs, DDQs, security questionnaires) is priced per project, with every contributor included; Engage (sales answers in Slack and Teams) is priced per user per month. Quotes come on a demo call; no free trial or free plan.
Who should pick Conveyor
Conveyor is the pick for security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place.
- Every drafted answer cites its source document, and confidence scores point reviewers at the exceptions.
- Questionnaires and the trust center run on one knowledge library, so the answer a buyer reads matches the one you send.
- Usage-based Enterprise pricing with unlimited users and seats, so pulling in subject matter experts does not add licences.
Who should pick Tribble
Tribble is the pick for enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge.
- Every answer traces to approved source material, which matters for regulated pitches.
- Connects buyer context, proposal history, and outcomes in one layer.
- Deep integrations (Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, HubSpot, Gong) fit enterprise stacks.
Final verdict
These tools solve different problems, so the right pick depends on your priorities. In our capability model, Conveyor leads on security questionnaires and self-serve setup, while Tribble leads on RFPs and DDQs. Tribble has the edge on DDQs and security questionnaires combined in our capability model. Many teams also run a dedicated AI-drafting tool alongside their existing stack rather than switching wholesale.
Read the full Conveyor review or Tribble review, or browse all RFP & DDQ software.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Conveyor and Tribble?
Conveyor: AI security questionnaires plus an agentic trust center. Tribble: Governed AI answer layer for enterprise sales. Conveyor is best for security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place. Tribble is best for enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge.
Which is cheaper, Conveyor or Tribble?
Neither publishes a comparable starting price, so request quotes for the same scope before comparing cost.
Is Conveyor or Tribble better for DDQs and security questionnaires?
Tribble scores higher on DDQ and security-questionnaire handling in our capability model, though both support them.
Do Conveyor and Tribble both handle RFPs?
Conveyor: yes, a core strength. Tribble: yes, a core strength.
Which should you choose, Conveyor or Tribble?
Conveyor is the pick for security and sales teams handling a steady flow of customer security reviews who want questionnaires and a trust center in one place. Tribble is the pick for enterprise teams that want AI answers governed by approved, evidence-linked knowledge.
Are there alternatives to Conveyor and Tribble?
Yes. Browse the full directory of RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire platforms for more options and side-by-side comparisons.
Do Conveyor and Tribble list ISO 27001, SOC 2, and US or EU hosting?
Conveyor: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Yes (United States), EU Not listed, Slack Slack (notifications, self-serve answers, questionnaire intake), Teams Microsoft Teams (notifications), clouds AWS, GCP. Tribble: ISO 27001 Not listed, SOC 2 SOC 2 Type II, US Not listed, EU Not listed, Slack Slack, Teams Microsoft Teams, clouds Not listed. Confirm both on the vendor sites.
Source registry
Every page we read for these profiles, with the month it was last checked. Anything without a source is shown as not publicly disclosed. Spot an outdated fact? Send it from the corrections page.
Conveyor
Pricing
Security and compliance
Product and integrations
- conveyor.com/products/ai-rfp-software-conveyor
- docs.conveyor.com/docs/importing-questionnaires
- conveyor.com/products/security-questionnaire-automation
- docs.conveyor.com/llms.txt
- conveyor.com/integrations
- docs.conveyor.com/docs/integrations-overview
- conveyor.com/conveyor-customers
- conveyor.com/company/about
- docs.conveyor.com/docs/sig-hecvat-caiq
Third-party reviews
Tribble
Pricing
Security and compliance
- No security source URL recorded. Treat certifications and hosting as not publicly disclosed.
Product and integrations
Third-party reviews